Abstract
We have been able so far to inquire into the general conditions of human cognition without paying much attention to language. There were only two suggestions: in chapter 8 that normal physiological maturation, i.e. the final structuring of the human brain, might require exposure to language; and, in the preceding chapter, that in technological cognition language marks the difference between descriptive and prescriptive knowledge on the one hand, and tacit and ineffable knowledge on the other. However, the linguistic turn described in chapter 2 has made the inquiry into the nature of language unavoidable for any theory of science. The turn has brought the linguistic aspect of science to such a prominence that it has overshadowed all the other facets of the phenomenon. Still, as we have seen, the logic of science has approached language almost exclusively along its syntactical dimension and descriptive function ignoring all others. Such an oversimplifying approach is particularly inappropriate for an integral theory of science. So we must try again.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lelas, S. (2000). Linguosynthesis. In: Science and Modernity. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 214. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9036-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9036-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0247-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9036-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive