Skip to main content

Making Mice and Other Devices: The Dynamics of Instrumentation in American Biomedical Research (1930–1960)

  • Chapter
Instrumentation Between Science, State and Industry

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences ((SOSC,volume 22))

  • 618 Accesses

Abstract

In 1937, in a manner typical of the New Deal approach to governmental duties, Washington policy makers considered the creation of a federal agency that would support medical research on the cancer problem. During the spring of that year, as a contribution to this public debate, the major news magazines depicted on their covers the fight against the dread disease. In March, Life displayed a picture of hundreds of inbred mice produced by the Jackson Memorial Laboratory at Bar Harbor. Mice were presented as the “ideal laboratory tool for the propagation and study of cancer” under the general headline “Mice replace Men on the Cancer Battlefield.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abir-Am, Pnina (1982). The discourse of physical power and biological knowledge in the 1930s: A reappraisal of the Rockefeller Foundation’s policy in molecular biology. Social Studies of Science 12:341–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 131 (1965). Adipose Tissue Metabolism and Obesity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, Susan (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bud, Robert F. (1978). Strategy in American cancer research after World War II: A case study. Social Studies of Science 8:425–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creager, Angela (2001, in press). The life of a virus: Wendell Stanley, TMV, and material models in biomedical research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creager, Angela and Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (2000, in press). Experimental arrangements and technologies of visualization, in J.-P. Gaudillière and I. Löwy (eds.), Transmission: Human diseases between heredity and infection. Historical approaches. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzen, Bolie (1986). Two ultracentrifiiges: A comparative study of the social construction of two artefacts. Social Studies of Science 16: 621–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzen, Bolie (1988). Scientists and rotors. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Twente, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, Kenneth M. (1957). The chemotherapy program. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 19: 275–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, Peter and Hebbly, Bruce (eds.) (1992). Big science, the growth of large-scale research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (1998). The molecularization of cancer etiology in postwar United States, in S. de Chadarevian and H. Kamminga (eds.), Modularizing biology and medicine (pp. 165–193). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (1998, May). Rockefeller strategies during the Second World War: Molecular machines, viruses, and machines. Paper presented at the conference on ’Medicine as a Social Instrument: The Rockefeller Foundation, Medical Research and Public Health.’ Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (1999). Circulating mice and viruses: The Jackson Memorial Laboratory, the National Cancer Institute, and the genetics of breast cancer, 1930–1965, in M. Fortun and E. Mendelsohn (eds.), The practices of human genetics, sociology of science yearbook 1999 (pp. 89–124). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (2000, in press). L’invention de la biomédecine: la reconstruction des sciences du vivant en France après la guerre. Paris: Editions des Archives Contemporaines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhorn, Alfred (1953). A critical evaluation of the current status of clinical cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Research 13:202–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhorn, Alfred (1959). Invited remarks on the current status of research in clinical cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 5:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, Jean (1979). The first fifty years at the Jackson Laboratory. Bar Harbor: The Jackson Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounshell, David (1992). Du Pont and the management of large-scale research and development, in P. Galison and B. Hebbly (eds.), Big science, the growth of large-scale research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingalls, Ann M., Dickie, Margaret, and Snell, G. (1949). Obese, a new mutation in the house mouse. The Journal of Heredity 41: 317–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Laboratory (1954). Genes, mice and men: A quarter-century of progress at the R.B. Jackson Memorial Laboratory. Bar Harbor: Jackson Memorial Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Laboratory, Annual Reports 1956–57 and 1957–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Laboratory, Roscoe B. Jackson Memorial Laboratory (ed.) (1966). The biology of the laboratory mouse. Bar Harbor: The Jackson Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Laboratory (1986). Two ultracentrifuges: A comparative study of the social construction of two artefacts. Social Studies of Science 16: 621–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson Memorial Laboratory (1960, November). Research proposal to the National Science Foundation. Jackson Laboratory Archives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Lily (1986). W. M. Stanley’s Crystillization of the Tobacco Mosaic Virus, 1930–1940. Isis 77: 450–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Lily (1993). The molecular vision of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel (1987). The physicists: The history of a scientific community in Modern America. Cambridge, CA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Daniel L. (1995). Politics on the endless frontier. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert (1991). Partners in science: Foundations and natural scientists, 1900–1945. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert (1994). The Lords of the Fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Priscilla W. (1954). Fertile, obese, male mice. Journal of Heredity 45: 56–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwy, Ilana (1995). Between bench and bedside. Cambridge, CA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Jean (1955). An experimentalist’s approach to the problem of obesity. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 31:230–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Jean (1956). Appetite and obesity. Scientific American (November 1956), 21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Jean (1963a). Obesity. Annual Review of Medicine 14:111–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Jean (1963b). Obese adolescent girls, an unrecognized minority group. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 13:35–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minutes of the CCNSC Chemotherapy Review Board, List of mouse supply contracts (11959). NCI Archives, AR 002397

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Program of Cancer Chemotherapy Research: Information statement (1959). Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 1:99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, James T. (1987). The dread disease, cancer and modern American culture. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, Karen (1995). Making mice: C.C. Little, The Jackson Laboratory and the standardization of musmusculus for research. PhD thesis. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, Nicolas (1997a). The midcentury biophysics bubble: Hiroshima and the biological revolution in America, revisited. History of Science 35:245–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, Nicolas (1997b). Picture control: The emergence of electron microscopy and the transformation of American biology, 1940–1960. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, Nicolas (1998). Instruments, scientists, industrialists and the specificity of influence: The case of RCA and biological electron microscopy, in J.-P. Gaudillifcre and I. Löwy (eds.), the invisible industrialist: Manufactures and the construction of scientific knowledge (pp. 173–208). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockefeller Archive Center (= RAC):

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(a), RU 5, Mr. Pickles’ Appointment, 19 Sep 1936, Series 4, Box 22, Folder 260.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(b), RG 1.1, Clarence C. Little to Warren W. Weaver, 4 December 1937, Series 200, Box 143, Folder 1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(c), RG 1.2, Johannes Bauer to Warren W. Weaver, 24 March 1937, 100IHD Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(d), RG 1.1, Warren W. Weaver’s correspondence, Series 200, Box 143, Folder 1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(e) RG 1.1, Series 200, Box 143, Folder 1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(f), DATE RAC, RG 1.1 Series 200, Box 143, Folder 1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(g). RG 5, Edouard Pickles to Thomas Francis, 8 March 1945, Series 4, Box 22, Folder 260.

    Google Scholar 

  • RG(h) RG 1.1, Clarence C. Little to Warren W. Weaver, 3 May 1946, Series 200, Box 144, Folder 1777.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(i) RG 1.1, Clarence C. Little to L. Webster, 25 Jan 1941, Series 200, Box 143, Folder 1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(k). RG 1.1, Warren W. Weaver to Clarence C. Little, April 1943, Series 200, Box 143, Folder 1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(I). RG 1.2, Medical Sciences Division. Series 200, Box 113, Folder 1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAC(m), RG 1.1, Warren W. Weaver to Clarence C. Little, 21 March 1946, Series 200, Box 144, Folder 1777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, Paul (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Cancer Chemotherapy Program (1966). Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 50:397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubord, C. Gordon (1984). Origins and development of chemotherapy at the National Cancer Institute. Cancer Treatment Reports 68: 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubord, C. Gordon, Schepartz, Saul A., and Carter, Stephen C. (1977). Historical background of the National Cancer Institute’s drug development trust. National Cancer Institute Monographs 45: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubord, C. Gordon, Schepartz, Saul. A., Leiter, John, Endicott, Kenneth M., Carrese, Martin L., and Baker, Christopher G. (1966). History of the cancer chemotherapy program. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 50:349–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaudillière, JP. (2001). Making Mice and Other Devices: The Dynamics of Instrumentation in American Biomedical Research (1930–1960). In: Joerges, B., Shinn, T. (eds) Instrumentation Between Science, State and Industry. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9032-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9032-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0242-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9032-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics