Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences ((SOSC,volume 22))

Abstract

In the 1930s, 40s, and 50s, the American Jesse Beams (1898–1977) developed the modern ultra-centrifuge (Elzen 1986; Gordy 1983). The device and the man do not fit neatly into any standard institutional, professional, or intellectual mold. Long-time chairman of the University of Virginia physics department, Beams also sponsored two firms, acted as a key consultant to four additional companies, participated in the Manhattan Project, worked for the military during the 1940s and 50s, and contributed to numerous NSF science programs. Beams was not the classical academic, engineer, entrepreneur, nor technical consultant. Although often located at or near the University of Virginia, his principal connection to that academic institution was the huge and well-equipped workshops that he developed there during decades of arduous endeavor (Brown 1967).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bachelard, Gaston (1951). L’activité rationaliste de la physique contemporaine. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Frederick L. (1967). A brief history of the Physics Department of the University of Virginia, 1922–1961. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, Larry (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bud, Robert and Cozzens, Susan E. (eds.) (1992). Invisible connections: Instruments, institutions and science. Bellingham: SPIE Optical Engineering Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, Pierre (1915). La théorie physique, son objet, sa structure (1st ed.). Paris: J. Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, David O. and Mulkay, Michael (1976). Astronomy transformed: The emergence of radio astronomy in Britain. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzen, Boelie (1986). Two ultracentrifuges: A comparative study of the social construction of artefacts. Social Studies of Science 16(4), 621–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry and Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government Relations. Research Policy 29(2, February): 109–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galison, Peter (1997). Image and logic: Material culture of microphysics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Michael, Limoges, Camille, Nowotny, Helga, Schwartzman, Simon, Scott, Peter and Trow, Martin (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordy, W. (1983) Jesse Wakefield Beams. Biographical Memoirs, Vol. 54 (pp. 3–49). National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagner, Michael and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (1998). Experimental systems, objects of investigation, and spaces of representation, in M. Heidelberger and F. Steinle (eds.), Experimental Essays — Versuche zum Experiment (pp. 355–73). Baden-Baden: Nomos

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberger, Michael and Steinle, Friedrich (eds.) (1998). Experimental essays — Versuche zum Experiment. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberger, Michael (1998). Die Erweiterung der Wirklichkeit, in M. Heidelberger and F. Steinle (eds.), Experimental essays — Versuche zum Experiment (pp. 71–92). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, John, van Helden, A., and Hankins, T.L. (eds.) (1992). Instruments (special issue). Osiris 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heims, Steve J. (1991). The cybernetics group. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry and Leydesdorff, Loet (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government Relations. Research Policy 29(2), 109–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, Eric von (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (1992). Aramis ou l’amour des techniques. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, Edwin T. (1971a). Mirror-image twins: The communities of science and technology in 19th century America. Technology and Culture 12, 562–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, Edwin T. (1971b). The revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American engineering profession. Cleveland, OH: Press of Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, Loet and Etzkowitz, Henry (eds.) (1998). A triple helix of university-industry-government relations: The future location of research? New York: Science Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwy, Ilana and Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (1998). The invisible industrialist: manufactures and the construction of scientific knowledge. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, David (1984). Forces of Production: a Social History of Industrial Automation. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Anthony (1984). Constructing quarks: A sociological history of particle physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, Trevor J. (1986). Confronting nature: The sociology of solar-neutrino detection. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard V.O. (1969). Ontological Relativity and other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard V.O. (1972). Methods of logic. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, Willard V.O. (1986). Philosophy of logic, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, Terry (1993). The Bellevue grand electroaimant, 1900–1940: Birth of a research-technology community. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 24, 157–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, Terry (1999). Change or mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science. Social Science information 38(1, March), 149–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, Frederick (1974). The structure of scientific theories. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, Richard S. (1980). Never at rest: A biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Joerges, B., Shinn, T. (2001). A Fresh Look at Instrumentation an Introduction. In: Joerges, B., Shinn, T. (eds) Instrumentation Between Science, State and Industry. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9032-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9032-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0242-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9032-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics