Skip to main content

Definition and Classification of Philosophy

  • Chapter
Soviet Russian Dialectical Materialism
  • 115 Accesses

Abstract

The conception of the world (mirovozzrenie) was formerly defined as “the all-embracing consideration of all phenomena in nature and society”1; or as “a certain system of considering nature and society.”2 A new definition runs as follows: “A system of views (vzgljadov), notions and conceptions of the world as a whole.” 3 It is often said that Dialectical Materialism, i.e. this philosophy, is the Communist conception of the world 4; however, a distinction should be drawn between the general and the particular meaning of the term. “The essential kernel of every conception of the world, the conception of the world in the proper sense of the word, is formed by philosophical notions.”5 But interpreted more widely, the conception of the world includes not only philosophy, but also the other sciences. Science has the task of presenting ‘an exact chart of the world’; in its wider interpretation, science is a system of apprehending the laws (zakonomer-nosti) which govern nature, human society and thought 6; while natural science studies the laws of nature, social sciences investigate the laws governing the evolution of human society. 7

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DM 141.

    Google Scholar 

  2. KFS2 170b.

    Google Scholar 

  3. KFS4 350a.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pr 313a; ‘Rozental’ M. dial. Method 1954, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. KFS4 350a.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pr 313a.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ib.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Žd 259b.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ib.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller 50.

    Google Scholar 

  11. No. II, in Pravda, 26. Jan. 1931. German in Wetter 1952, 593 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  12. DM 141.

    Google Scholar 

  13. BSE 22. 133, KFS2292a.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pr3i3a.

    Google Scholar 

  15. On the part played, 472 (Sočinenija 18,187).

    Google Scholar 

  16. DM 141.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ib.

    Google Scholar 

  18. DM 143.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ib.

    Google Scholar 

  20. DM 144.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DM 147.

    Google Scholar 

  22. DM 150.

    Google Scholar 

  23. DM 151.

    Google Scholar 

  24. DM 152

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sviderskij 304.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pr 313-337.

    Google Scholar 

  27. DM 144.

    Google Scholar 

  28. ib.

    Google Scholar 

  29. ME 375; MEM 278.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tavanec-Boguslavskij 220.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Osmakov 376a.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vasilev 369b.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vyšinskij 344. 34. Vojšvillo; American review, by S. P. Maslov in: Journ. of Philos. 46.1949.105 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Osmakov 376b.

    Google Scholar 

  35. VF 1951.6.143.

    Google Scholar 

  36. AaO 144.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tavanec-Boguslavskij. 221

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mitin 1955. 40 Protivputanicy

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Voprosy Logiki.

    Google Scholar 

  41. E. K. Vojšvillo, K Voprosu 20 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gorsky; book review, VF 1956, 3, 214 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cf. on this point and on the whole question since 1946: Kline 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tomaševskij 12.

    Google Scholar 

  45. KFS2.

    Google Scholar 

  46. KFS4.

    Google Scholar 

  47. To-maševskij 12.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vasilev 369b.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Naučnaja Sessija … 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  50. On this whole question see I. London 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pr 326a.

    Google Scholar 

  52. KFS2. 323 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Soveščanie …; on 10.2 the opera ‘Velikaja Družba’ was condemned, see Werth.

    Google Scholar 

  54. RozentaP 1948(2).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zadaci 288.

    Google Scholar 

  56. KFS4 366 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Šarija, Šiškin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1963 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bochenski, J.M. (1963). Definition and Classification of Philosophy. In: Soviet Russian Dialectical Materialism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3629-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3629-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3631-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3629-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics