Advertisement

Magnetospheric and High Latitude Ionospheric Disturbance Phenomena

  • Neil Brice
Conference paper
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 10)

Abstract

This paper is divided into two sections. In the first of these we will discuss the average behaviour of magnetospheric and high-latitude ionospheric disturbance phenomena. Relevant observational data will be interrelated through consideration of the bulk motion (convective) flow pattern of the magnetosphere and the associated electric-field distribution. The term ‘average behaviour’ above refers to time-scales on the order of 1 year. In the second section we will deal with the characteristic temporal modulation of the average disturbance pattern. The material to be presented is essentially the same as that given in two papers at the Conjugate Point Symposium in Boulder (Brice, 1967a, b).

Keywords

Solar Wind Field Line Substorm Onset Earth Radius Outer Radiation Belt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akasofu, S.-I.: 1964, ‘The Development of the Auroral Substorm’, Planetary Space Sci. 12 (4), 273–282.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, G.: 1967, ‘Polar Magnetic Substorms’, J. Geophys. Res. 72(5), 1491–1494.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axford, W. I. and Hines, C. O.: 1961, ‘A Unifying Theory of High-Latitude Geophysical Phenomena and Geomagnetic Storms’, Can. J. Phys. 39, 1433–1464.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brice, N. M.: 1967a, ‘Average Behaviour of High Latitude Disturbance Phenomena’, presented at Conjugate Point Symposium, Boulder, Colo., June 13–16.Google Scholar
  5. Brice, N. M.: 1967b, ‘Morphology of Elementary Magnetospheric Substorms’, Conjugate Point Symposium, Boulder, Colo., June 13–16.Google Scholar
  6. Brice, N. M.: 1967c, ‘Bulk Motion of the Magnetosphere’, J. Geophys. Res. 72 (21) 5193.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, D. L.: 1966, ‘Whistler Studies of the Plasmapause in the Magnetosphere. 1 : Temporal Variations in the Position of the Knee and Some Evidence on Plasma Motions near the Knee’, J. Geophys. Res. 71 (3), 693–709.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, D. L. and Stone, K.: 1967, ‘Direct Detection by a Whistler Method of a Magnetospheric Electric Field associated with a Polar Substorm’, Planetary Space Sci. 15, 395–397.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalgarno, A., Latimer, I. D., and McConkey, J. W.: 1965, ‘Corpuscular Bombardment and N2 2 Radiation’, Planetary Space Sci. 13, 1008–1009.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dungey, J. W.: 1961, ‘Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones’, Phys. Rev. Letters 6, 47–78.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank, L. A.: 1965, ‘A Survey of Electrons E > 40 keV beyond 5 Earth Radii with Explorer 14’, J. Geophys. Res. 70(7), 1593–1626.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fukushima, N.: 1953, ‘Polar Magnetic Storms and Geomagnetic Bays’, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sec. II, VIII, part V.Google Scholar
  13. Hartz, T. R. and Brice, N. M.: 1967, ‘The General Pattern of Auroral Particle Precipitation’, Planetary Space Sci. 15(2), 301.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jelly, D. H.: 1968, ‘Apparent Poleward Motion of Onsets of Auroral Absorption Events’, Can. J. Phys. (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Jelly, D.H. and Brice, N.M.: 1967, ‘Changes in Van Allen Radiation Associated with Polar Substorms’, J. Geophys. Res. 72 (23) 5919.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jorgensen, T. S.: 1966, ‘Morphology of VLF Hiss Zones and Their Correlation with Particle Precipitation Events’, J. Geophys. Res. 71, 1367.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennel, C. F. and Petschek, H. E.: 1966, ‘Limit on Stably Trapped Particle Fluxes’, J. Geophys. Res. 71(1), 1–28.ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Levy, R. H., Petschek, H. E., and Siscoe, G. L.: 1964, ‘Aerodynamic Aspects of the Magnetospheric flow’, AIAA Journal 2(12), 2065–2076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayaud, P. N.: 1960, ‘Un nouveau système de coordonnées magnétiques pour l’étude de la haute atmosphère: Les coordonnées de l’anneau équatorial’, Ann. Geophys. 16, 278–288.Google Scholar
  20. McDiarmid, I. B. and Burrows, J. R.: 1964, ‘Diurnal Intensity Variations in the Outer Radiation Zone at 100 km’, Can. J. Phys. 42, 1135.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morozumi, H. M. and Helliwell, R. A.: 1966, ‘A Correlation Study of the Diurnal Variation of Upper Atmospheric Phenomena in the Southern Auroral Zone’, Scientific Report number 2, Radioscience Laboratories, Stanford, Calif., December.Google Scholar
  22. Nishida, A.: 1966, ‘Formation of a Plasmapause, or Magnetospheric Plasma Knee by Combined Action of Magnetospheric Convection and Plasma Escape from the Tail’, J. Geophys. Res. 71 (23), 5669–5679.ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Nishida, A., Iwasaki, N., and Nagata, T.: 1965, ‘The Origin of Fluctuations in the Equatorial: A New Electrojet Type of Geomagnetic Variation’, Proc. Second Int. Symp. on Equatorial Aeronomy, Ed. F. de Mendonca, Comissão Nacional de Atividades Espaciais, São Jose dos Campos, Brazil.Google Scholar
  24. Sandford, B. P.: 1964, ‘Aurora and Airglow Intensity Variations with Time and Magnetic Activity at Southern High Latitudes’, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 26, 749.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharp, R. D., Johnson, R. G., Shea, M. F., and Shook, G. B.: 1968, ‘Satellite Measurements of Precipitating Protons in the Auroral Zone’, J. Geophys. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  26. Williams, D. J. and Ness, N. F.: 1966, ‘Simultaneous Trapped Electron and Magnetic Tail Field Observations’, J. Geophys. Res. 71(21), 5117–5128.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Brice
    • 1
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations