Abstract
This discussion actually took place after the Reports by Lüst and by Pottasch. However, the remarks pertaining to Pottasch’s Report have been combined with the discussion following Boyarchuk’s Report, since the latter two Reports appeared to have more in common than the first two. I have condensed several contributions, notably a very long remark by Gordon.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bisnovaty-Kogan, G. S. and Gordon, I. M.: 1969, Astron. Zh., in press.
Gordon, I. M.: 1967, Astron. Circ. Akad. Nauk SSSR, N447.
Gordon, I. M.: 1968a, Astron. Zh. 45, 1002.
Gordon, I. M.: 1968b, Astrophys. Lett. 2, 49.
Gordon, I. M.: 1968c, Astron. Circ. Akad. Nauk SSSR, N487.
Gordon, I. M.: 1969, Astrophys. Lett. 3, 181.
James, J. C.: 1964, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. AP-12, 876.
James, J. C.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 146, 356.
Philip, K. W.: 1968, Astron. J. 73, S197.
Wild, J. P.: 1967, Proc. Astron. Soc. Austr. 1, 59.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1970 IAU
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weymann, R. (1970). Discussion Following Lüst’s Report. In: Habing, H.J. (eds) Interstellar Gas Dynamics. International Astronomical Union/Union Astronomique Internationale, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3329-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3329-9_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3331-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3329-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive