Skip to main content

The Concept of “Isolation” in Contemporary Aesthetic Theory

  • Chapter
Aesthetics I

Part of the book series: Tulane Studies in Philosophy ((TUSP,volume 19))

  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

A consideration of the concept of “isolation” in contemporary aesthetic theory will enable me to suggest a position which denies that the aesthetic has to do only with what is immediately presented. The point will be made by arguing that a work of art exhibits aspects or elements which are tied to a historical period and that in some cases a work of art cannot be viewed aesthetically until these elements are considered or evaluated. An analysis of three uses of isolation in contemporary aesthetic theory will enable me to show the relevance of the historical components of a work of art to the aesthetic response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Susanne Langer, Feeling and Form (New York, 1953), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer Schapiro, “Style” in Aesthetics Today, ed. Morris Philipson (Cleveland, 1961), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard Berenson, Aesthetics and History ( Garden City, N.Y., 1954 ), pp. 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Mitchells, “The Work of Art in Its Social Setting and in Its Aesthetic Isolation,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, XXV (Summer 1967 ), 373.

    Google Scholar 

  5. French Poetry from Baudelaire to the Present, ed. Elaine Marks (New York, 1962) pp. 278–279.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jerome Schiller, “An Alternative to ‘Aesthetic Disinterestedness’,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, XXII (Spring, 1964), 295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clive Bell, Art (New York, 1959) pp. 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. S. Eliot, The Frontiers of Criticism (Minneapolis, 1956 ), pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jerome Stolnitz, Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Criticism (Boston, 1960), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roger Fry, Vision and Design (Cleveland, 1956), pp. 269–270.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See George Dickie’s discussion of Stolnitz’s use of the terms “interestedly” and “disinterestedly” in “The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude,” in American Philosophical Quarterly, I (January, 1969), 58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cormier, R. (1970). The Concept of “Isolation” in Contemporary Aesthetic Theory. In: Aesthetics I. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3258-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3258-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-5073-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3258-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics