Skip to main content
  • 141 Accesses

Abstract

Miller writes hundreds of pages describing in the minutest and clearest detail his exploits in bed. Every serious reader of erotica has remarked about Miller that he is probably the only author in history who writes about such things with complete ease and naturalness. Lawrence never quite rid himself of his puritanical consciousness, nor Joyce; both had too much religion in their veins… Miller‘s achievement is miraculous: he is screamingly funny without making fun of sex, the way Rabelais does…. Miller is accurate and poetic in the highest degree; there is not a smirk anywhere in his writings.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Karl Shapiro, In Defense of Ignorance. New York: Random House, 1960, p. 324.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walter Allen, The Modern Novel. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1964, p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ludwig Marcuse, Obscene. Translated by Karen Gershon. London: Macgibbon & Kee, 1965, p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Fraenkel, The Genesis of the Tropic of Cancer. Berkeley, California: Ben Porter, 1946, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ludwig Marcuse, Obscene, p. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Loth, The Erotic in Literature. New York: Julian Messner, Inc., 1961, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henry Miller, Selected Prose. London: Macgibbon & Kee, 1965, II, 364.

    Google Scholar 

  8. This is a greatly enlarged and thoroughly revised version of an article by the present writer, “Henry Miller: Individualism in Extremis,” Southwest Review,Summer, 1948, XXXm, pp. 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henry Miller, Tropic of Cancer. Paris: The Obelisk Press, 1939, p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henry Miller, Tropic of Capricorn. Paris: The Obelisk Press, 1939, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henry Miller, Sexus. Paris: The Obelisk Press, 1949, p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henry Miller, The Cosmological Eye. Norfolk, Connecticut: New Directions, 1939, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Art and Outrage: A Correspondence about Henry Miller between Lawrence Durrell and Alfred Perles. New York: E. P. Dutton & Company, Inc., 1961, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kingsley Widmer, Henry Miller. New York: Twayne Publishers, Inc., 1963, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Selections from Ralph Waldo Emerson. Edited by Stephen E. Whicher. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1957, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Why is man unhappy and lonely in spite of an abundance of sexual opportunities? Why does fulfillment not necessarily generate gratitude and love but often produce hostility and hate?&#x201D Clemens E. Benda, The Image of Love. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc., 1961, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. H. Lawrence, Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious and Fantasia of the Unconscious. New York: The Viking Press, 1960, p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  18. “Under male dominance women have always accepted the roles which men have created for them. Having reduced them to the role of submissive dependents, men then criticized them for being submissively dependent.” H. R. Hays, The Dangerous Sex. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1964, p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Henry Miller has been severely criticized – and rightly so – for his imperceptive treatment of women in fiction. “Most of the sexual encounters in the Tropics and The Rosy Crucifixion are comic accidents. The woman never emerges at all.” Kenneth Rexroth, Bird in the Bush. New York: New Directions, 1959, p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Henry Miller Reader. Edited by Lawrence Durrell. Norfolk, Connecticut: New Directions, 1959, p. 356.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lawrence Durrell and Henry Miller: A Private Correspondence. Edited by George Wickes. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1963, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leslie A. Fiedler, Waiting for the End. New York: Stein and Day, 1964, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Henry Miller, Plexus. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1963, p. 373.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glicksberg, C.I. (1971). Henry Miller: Prophet of the Sexual Revolution. In: The Sexual Revolution in Modern American Literature. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3236-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3236-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-5036-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3236-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics