Skip to main content

Abstract

The two plays which have been discussed dealt with Athens, in its decline and at its foundation. Shakespeare’s interest in antiquity, however, was obviously broader than any concern with the Athenian polis. He stood at the beginning of modernity. No doubt he knew something of the new men who had made or were making modernity, like Machiavelli, perhaps Bacon. But his problem was less to affirm a classical teaching in contrast with Machiavelli than to affirm a classical teaching in contrast with Christianity. With that contrast in mind, we must turn to some of the plays which deal with the end of antiquity in a broader sense, not simply with the rise and fall of Athens. True, we have not yet exhausted Athens. The crucial scene in Antony and Cleopatra takes place there. If Shakespeare wrote all or part of The Two Noble Kinsmen, the Crete and Athens of Palemon and Arcite might be contrasted with their own Christian chivalry. Yet to see Shakespeare’s teaching regarding antiquity we must go beyond the Athenian plays as such and turn to those works where the teaching regarding antiquity is, for whatever reason, rather thinly veiled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Robin Moffet, “Cymbeline and the Nativity,” Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 13, pp. 207–218, (Sprnger, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Brookbank, “History and Histrionics in Cymbeline,” Shakespeare Survey II (1958), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. M. Nosworthy, Arden edition of Cymheline (London, 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elmer Edgar Stoll, Shakespeare’s Young Lovers (Oxford, 1937), pp. 87 ff

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giordano Bruno, Gena della Ceneri Opere Italiene (Bari, 1927), I, 31

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Knight, The Crown of Life (London, 1952), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cropsey, ed., Ancients and Moderns, Essays on the Tradition of Political Philosophy in Honor of Leo Strauss (New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kurt Riezler, “Psychology of Revolution” in Social Research X (Sept. 1943), Pp.320–36.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leo Strauss, Thoughts on Machiavelli (Glencoe, Illinois, 1958), pp. 96–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, H.B. (1970). “Statist Though I am None”. In: Copp’d Hills Towards Heaven Shakespeare and the Classical Polity. Archieves Internationales D’Histoire des Idees / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3189-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3189-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3191-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3189-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics