Abstract
Cambyses invaded Egypt because Amasis had deceived him; he had sent the daughter of the former king when Cambyses demanded one of his own; he had hoped that her beauty and height, set off with fine garments and gold, would fool Cambyses; he had not counted on her speaking the truth when Cambyses addressed her as the daughter of Amasis (1). Amasis’ trust in her silence seems to have been founded on the silence Herodotus had discovered in Egypt itself. Speaking appeared so alien to Egypt that even Amasis did not consider the error in his deception. But Herodotus adds that this is what the Persians say; the Persians understand the Egyptians in this way; they think the Egyptians are so addicted to show and position that they would overlook the possibility of the truth being spoken. The Persians do not respond only to the surface of things; they are accustomed to tell the truth, and seeing means less to them: apparently an eye-ailment of Cyrus was the ultimate cause of Cambyses’ invasion (1.1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1969 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benardete, S. (1969). Persia. In: Herodotean Inquiries. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3161-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3161-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0015-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3161-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive