Abstract
There is in the philosophy of science a view of the nature of science which is often referred to as the orthodox view. In my opinion Dudley Shapere has succinctly characterized the main tenets of this view in his article ’Meaning and Scientific Change’.1 According to this view, let me refer to it as the orthodox Logical Empiricist (LE) view, the problem of developing a theory of scientific change was not considered to be a legitimate problem for the philosophy of science. A primary concern of the Logical Empiricist was to analyze the logical structure which is shared by all scientific theories. From the point of view of the development of science the logical structure of scientific theories is a constant. What varies from one theory to another is their empirical content not their logical form.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L. Sklar, ‘Types of Inter-Theoretic Reduction’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18. (1967) 109–24.
K. Schaffner, ‘Approaches to Reduction’, Philosophy of Science 34 (1967) 137–47.
R. Suszko, ‘Formal Logic and the Development of Knowledge’, in Problems in the Phil of Set (ed. by I. Lakatos and Musgrave ), Amsterdam 1968, pp. 210–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siemens, W.D. (1971). A Logical Empiricist Theory of Scientific Change?. In: Buck, R.C., Cohen, R.S. (eds) PSA 1970. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0309-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3142-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive