Skip to main content

Unknown Probabilities, Bayesianism, and De Finetti’s Representation Theorem

  • Chapter
PSA 1970

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 8))

Abstract

In the development of the theory of subjective probability and in discussions about it an important role has been played by de Finetti’s representation theorem and by a number of related results presented in de Finetti’s classic monograph.1 This theorem, together with the notion of exchangeability (among its aliases there are the terms equivalence, permutability, and symmetry), was originally put forward by Bruno de Finetti as a solution to a problem to which his subjectivistic interpretation of probability had led him. Although this theorem is mentioned in many expositions of the theory of subjective probability, there are not many satisfactory discussions of its significance available to philosophers. (The best one, and almost the only one, is Braithwaite’s paper ‘On Unknown Probabilities’.2) The purpose of the present paper is not to present any new results but rather to call attention to certain philosophical issues connected with it that apparently are not as fully appreciated as they ought to be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Bruno de Finetti, ‘La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives’, in Annates de I’institut Henri Poincaré, Vol. 7 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry E. Kyburg under the title ‘Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources’, in Studies in Subjective Probability (ed. by H. E. Kyburg and H. E. Smokier ), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1964, pp. 93–158.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. B. Braithwaite, ‘On Unknown Probabilities’, in Observation and Interpretation: A Symposium of Philosophers and Physicists (ed. by S. Körner ), Butterworth, London, 1957, pp. 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donald Davidson, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in The Logic of Action and Preference (ed. by Nicholas Rescher ), Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A New Approach to a Classical Statistical Decision Problem’, in Induction: Some Current Issues (ed. by H. E. Kyburg and E. Nagel ), Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, 1961, pp. 101–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Gaifman, ‘Concerning Measures on First-Order Calculi’, Israel Journal of Mathematics 2 (1964) 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Roger C. Buck Robert S. Cohen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hintikka, J. (1971). Unknown Probabilities, Bayesianism, and De Finetti’s Representation Theorem. In: Buck, R.C., Cohen, R.S. (eds) PSA 1970. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0309-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3142-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics