Abstract
Of the many problems involved in discussions of acceptability and justification I wish to consider in this paper what types of sentences can be used in order to justify a given claim or theory in science, what types of sentence can be appealed to in testing (showing to be acceptable or rejecting) a theory or claim. Rather than rehashing old critcisms of previous work, or constructing new counters to works already known to be inadequate, I propose to get on with the problem at hand. Necessarily this ‘getting on’ is in large part a taxonomic and programmatic venture. I wishto suggest, briefly and by examples, that in fact there have been, and are, at least four different types of bases to which appeal is made in testing or justifying a theory or claim.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Galileo Galilei, De Motu, Drabkin Translation, University of Wisconsin in Press, Madison, 1960, p. 23.
L. Nash, The Atomic-Molecular Theory, Harvard Case Studies in History of Science, Harvard UP, 1950, pp. 88 and 17.
I. Newton, Principia. Definitions, Lot Scholium. Motte-Cajori Translation, University of California Press. 1934, pp. 6–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Machamer, P.K. (1971). Observation. In: Buck, R.C., Cohen, R.S. (eds) PSA 1970. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0309-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3142-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive