Skip to main content

Observation

  • Chapter
PSA 1970

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 8))

Abstract

Of the many problems involved in discussions of acceptability and justification I wish to consider in this paper what types of sentences can be used in order to justify a given claim or theory in science, what types of sentence can be appealed to in testing (showing to be acceptable or rejecting) a theory or claim. Rather than rehashing old critcisms of previous work, or constructing new counters to works already known to be inadequate, I propose to get on with the problem at hand. Necessarily this ‘getting on’ is in large part a taxonomic and programmatic venture. I wishto suggest, briefly and by examples, that in fact there have been, and are, at least four different types of bases to which appeal is made in testing or justifying a theory or claim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Galileo Galilei, De Motu, Drabkin Translation, University of Wisconsin in Press, Madison, 1960, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Nash, The Atomic-Molecular Theory, Harvard Case Studies in History of Science, Harvard UP, 1950, pp. 88 and 17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Newton, Principia. Definitions, Lot Scholium. Motte-Cajori Translation, University of California Press. 1934, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Roger C. Buck Robert S. Cohen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Machamer, P.K. (1971). Observation. In: Buck, R.C., Cohen, R.S. (eds) PSA 1970. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0309-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3142-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics