Skip to main content

Non-Pure Synthetic a Priori Judgments in the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Historical Library ((SYHL,volume 4))

Abstract

The arguments put forward in this paper attempt to show the relevance of a remark of Kant’s on the propositional content of the principle of causality and the structure of the Analogies of Experience. This remark, though marking a decisive point in Kant’s transcendental theory of experience, has not been dealt with adequately by Kantian scholars. Consequently, to some of them the very title of this paper may appear to contradict what they regard as basic Kantian doctrine. This paper attempts to prove that what may seem to contradict basic Kantian assertions is a basic, though problematic, Kantian assertion itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf. P. Plaass,Kants Theorie der Naturwissenschaft, Göttingen, 1965, and the excellent application of P. Strawson’s view of Kant to this problem in Ralph C. S. Walker’s paper on ‘The Status of Kant’s Theory of Matter’, published in these Kant Proceedings, p. 591.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. K. Cramer, Zur systematischen Differenz von Apriorität und Reinheit in Kants Lehre von den synthetischen Urteilen a priori,Subjectivität und Metaphysik, Festschrift fürW. Cramer, Frankfurt, 1966 p. 23 If.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Lewis White Beck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1972 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cramer, K. (1972). Non-Pure Synthetic a Priori Judgments in the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. In: White Beck, L. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress. Synthese Historical Library, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3099-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3099-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3101-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3099-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics