Abstract
At first sight, the question of the aim of the Critique of Pure Reason may appear to be historical rather than philosophical in nature. Most Kantian scholars seem to have regarded it as such although Kant himself, as one can easily infer from the doctrines of the Architectonic of Pure Reason, would consider it as a major philosophical issue. Accordingly, those who subscribe to a historical view of the topic at hand or treat of it as pertaining to the Entwicklungsgeschichte of the Critique1 either completely ignore Kant’s own teachings on this point or implicitly deny their philosophical validity, without inquiring into the meaning and truth of their author’s own words.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
E.g., H. J. de Vleeschauwer, ‘Wie ich jetzt die Kritik der reinen Vernunft entwick- lungsgeschichtlich lese’, Kant-Studien, Vol. 54, 351–368; D. P. Dryer, ‘The Aim of the Critique of Pure Reason’, Dialogue, Vol. II, 301 ff.
A. Riehl, Der Philosophische Kritizismus Vol. I (1924), 383.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1972 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bilek, G.E. (1972). The Aim of Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. In: White Beck, L. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress. Synthese Historical Library, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3099-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3099-1_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3101-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3099-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive