Abstract
It has been the purpose of this work to enter into contact with new horizons of thought. The problems of idealism and value philosophy are by no means new to the philosophical stage. But as G. Allport noted some years ago for the field of psychology, the practitioners of this science had thrown the self overboard along with the soul. He was saying that psychology could make little headway in dealing with the more complex human realities until it took seriously the omnipresent factor of “ego involvement.”1 Something along these lines could be said, I believe, for American philosophy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cf. P. Blair-Rice, “Children of Narcissus,” Kenyon Review, 1950 (12) p. 137.
Cf. G. Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistémologie, Louvain, 1960, p. 249.
G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 242.
G. Bastide, Traité, T.I., p. 155.
Cf. F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, Louvain, 1965 (4th edition), p. 62.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 65.
Cf. J. Ladrière, “Philosophy and Science,” Philosophical Studies,1958 (8) pp....-5.
Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, T.I., p. 127.
G. Bastide, Traité, p. 356.
Cf. F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, pp. 98–99.
Ibid., p. 132.
Cf. R. Verneaux, Les sources cartesiennes, p. 462.
Cf. F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 67.
Cf. G. Bastide, “La conversion spirituelle,” p. 19.06-6.
G. Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistémologie, p. 256.
Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, T.I., p. 140.
G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 246.
G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 129.
G. Bastide, Traité, T.I., p. 141.
Ibid., p. 140.
Cf. R. Descartes, Méditations, III., 15, 17.
Cf. F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 83.
Cf. also G. Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistémologie, p. 256.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 84.
Ibid., p. 87.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought and Christian Faith, p. 31.
G. Bastide, De la condition humaine, p. 365.
G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 245.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 250.
Cf. also R. Verneaux, Les sources cartésiennes, p. 476.
R. Verneaux, Ibid., p. 477.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, 1941 (4), p. 615.
G. Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistémologie, p. 263.
G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 245.
L. Brunschvicg, La modalité du jugement, p, 2.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealism of realism,” p. 610.
L. Brunschvicg, La modalité du jugement, p. 2.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 613.
Cf. G. Bastide, De la condition humaine, p. 3.
G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 60. Cf. also p. 45.
G. Bastide, De la condition humaine, p. 323.
Cf. F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, pp. 68 and 252.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 615.
Cf. Part I, chapter II, pp. 80–83.
L. Brunschvicg, La modalité du jugement, p. 91.
Ibid., p. 92.
Cf. Part I, chapter II of this work, note 6.
Cf. also G. Bastide, Traité, pp. 155 and 195.
J. Ladrière, “La philosophie des mathématiques et la problème du formalisme,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 1959 (9), pp. 165–166.
L. Brunschvicg, Le Progrès de la Conscience, T. II, pp. 692–695.
Cf. R. Le Senne, Introduction a la Philosophie, pp. 3, 89, 356.
Cf. also G. Bastide, De la condition humaine, p. 376
La conversion spirituelle, p. 70.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 78.
G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 169.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 80.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 627.
Cf. A. Etcheverry, L’idéalisme français contemporain, p. 297.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 627.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 86.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 89.
Ibid., p. 90.
Cf. L. Brunschvicg, La modalité du jugement, p. 92.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 629.
Ibid.
Cf. Part I, chapter II, p. 80.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 631.
Cf. F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 23.
Cf. R. Verneaux, Les sources cartesiennes, p. 491.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 631.
Cf. G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 169.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 77.
Ibid., pp. 98–99.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” pp. 633–634.
J. Ladrière, “La philosophie des mathématiques et le problème du formalisme,” Revue Philosophiques de Louvain, 1959 (9), 167–168.
G. Bastide, Traité, II., p. 724.
Cf. G. Bastide, “Le malin génie,” p. 238.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 634.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 89.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 89.
This is contrary to the opinion of Gilson, cf. F. Van Steenberghen, ibid., p. 90.
J. Ladrière, “La philosophie des mathématiques,” pp. 163–165.
Cf. A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 642.
Cf. Part II, chapter two of this work.
F. Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 235.
A. Dondeyne, “Idéalisme of réalisme,” p. 642.
Ibid., p. 643.
Ibid.
Cf. Part II, chapter one.
Cf. G. Bastide, Méditations, pp. 45 and 60.
Cf. R. Verneaux, Les sources cartésiennes, p. 336;
cf. Also A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 147.
A. Dondeyne, Ibid., p. 146.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” pp. 644–645.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 145.
Ibid., p. 147.
G. Bastide, Méditations, pp. 6 and 8.
Cf. Part II, chapter four, p. 552 of this work.
F van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 147.
Cf. G. Bastide, “L’expérience morale,” p. 310.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 147.
Ibid., p. 150.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 646.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 142.
Ibid., pp. 144 and 157. Cf. also A. Dondeyne, “L’abstraction,” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie, 1938 (aôut et février), pp. 5–20; 339–373.
G. Bastide, De la condition humaine, p. 369.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 138.
Cf. G. Bastide, De la condition humaine, pp. 280–293.
E. Gilson, L’être et l’Essence, Paris, 1947, p. 309 cited by A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 156.
A. Dondeyne, ibid., p. 156.
Ibid.
A. Dondeyne, “Idealisme of realisme,” p. 648.
G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, pp. 73, 86.
Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, I., p. 196;
also cf. De la condition humaine, p. 319.
G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, vii.
G. Bastide, Traité, p. 140.
Ibid.
A. Etcheverry, “La valeur et l’être,” in Les Valeurs (Actes du III Congrès des Sociétés de philosophie de langue française), Louvain, 1947, p. 78.
G. Bastide, Traité, T.I., p. 123.
Ibid.
Cf. A. Wylleman, “L’homme et la création des valeurs,” Revue philosophique de Louvain, 1960 (février), p. 89.
Ibid.
Cf. also L. Brunschvicg, Le Progrès de la conscience, pp. 692–701
G. Bastide, Traité, T.I., pp. 712–713.
A. Wylleman, ibid., p. 90.
Cf. also the expositions of F. Alquie and J. Wahl in Expérience, pp. 29–41 and 409–424.
Cf. G. Bastide, De la condition humaine, pp. 324–348;
Traité, pp. 332–353 and chapter IV, Part II of this work.
Cf. p. 361 of this work.
G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 8.
Cf. G. Bastide, “L’expérience morale,” in Experience, pp. 307–323.
Ibid., p. 308.
Ibid., pp. 308 and 309.
Ibid., p. 320.
G. Bastide, “L’expérience morale,” p. 315.
Ibid., p. 320.
F Van Steenberghen, Epistémologie, p. 226, note 1.
G. Bastide, Traité, p. 141.
G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 242.
Cf. Part II, chapter one, p. 199 of this work.
Ibid. Cf. G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 60.
G. Bastide, Traité, T. II., p. 724.
G. Bastide, Traité, T. I., pp. 58, 170, 199–200; T. II., p. 488.
Ibid., pp. 380–381. Cf. Also pp. 340 and 347.
Cf. p. 357 of this work.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 97.
G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 60.
E. Morot-Sir, “Etre et Valeur,” in Encyclopédie française, p. 19.06–15.
Ibid., p. 19.06–16.
J. Maritain, Moral Philosophy, New York, 1964, pp. 15–16.
Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, p. 92. Cf. also G. Bastide, Le moment historique de Socrate, pp. 272–298.
Cf. F. Van Steenberghen, p. 68, note 2.
Cf. G. Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistemologie, p. 292.
Cf. the remarks of Van Riet concerning H. Duméry, ibid., pp. 291–293.
Cf. G. Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistemologie, p. 294.
G. Van Riet, ibid., p. 294.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 296.
Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, T.I., pp. 356–357.
Cf. also G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 256.
Cf. Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistémologie, p. 240.
Cf. G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. 74.
Ibid., p. 70.
A. Dondeyne, Contemporary European Thought, p. 23.
G Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistémologie, p. 337.
G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 245.
G. Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistémologie, p. 340 (parentheses are mine).
Cf. A. Wylleman, Tildschrift voor Philosophie, 1959 (21), p. 613 (summary in French).
A. Wylleman, “Valeur et existence,” in Les Valeurs, p. 83.
A. Wylleman, “Valeur et existence,” p. 84.
Ibid., p. 85.
Ibid., p. 85. Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, p. 90.
A. Wylleman, ibid., p. 85.
G. Bastide, Traité, p. 90.
Cf. Part II, chapter one, p. 199.
A. Wylleman, “Valeur et existence,” p. 85.
G. Bastide, Traité, p. 155.
A. Wylleman, “Le bien comme fondement métaphysique du droit et de la morale,” in Actas III of the Congresso internacional de filosofia, Barcelona, 1948 published at Madrid, 1949, p. 323.
Ibid., p. 322. A. Wylleman, “Le bien,” p. 322.
Ibid., p. 323.
Ibid.
G. Van Riet, Problème d’épistémologie, p. 234.
Cf. G. Bastide, Les grands thèmes, p. 132.
Q Van Riet, Problèmes d’épistémologie, p. 241.
Ibid., p. 244. The author also briefly investigated this problem in his unpublished Master’s thesis: Existential Situation Ethics: A Search for the Real, pp. 103–125, Chicago, 1965.
G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 245.
Ibid., p. 246.
Cf. J. Leclercq, Les grands lignes de la philosophie morale, Louvain, 1964 (3rd edition), p. 61.
G. Bastide, Traité, pp. 356–357.
Ibid., p. 106.
J. Leclercq, Les grands lignes, p. 281.
G. Bastide, Traité, p. 356.
Cf. G. Bastide, Méditations, p. 93.
G. Bastide, “L’expérience morale,” p. 320.
Cf. for example G. Bastide, Traité, pp. 187–209.
G Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, vii.
G. Bastide, Traité, pp. 380–382.
Ibid., T. II., p. 621; cf. also T. II., p. 3.
Cf. G. Bastide, “La conversion spirituelle,” p. 19.06-6.
Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, p. 356.
G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. 82.
Cf. G. Bastide, Méditations, pp. 15, 45, 59.
Ibid., p. 57.
G. Bastide, Traité, p. 141.
G. Bastide, La conversion spirituelle, p. 74.
Cf. J. Naus, The Nature of the Practical Intellect according to Saint Thomas Aquinas, Gregorian Press, Rome, 1959, p. 202.
Cf. also J. Leclercq, La philosophie morale de Saint Thomas devant la pensée contemporaine, pp. 137–153.
Cf. also the discussion which W. Wallace brings to this question in regards to the work of F. Rahner: The Dynamic Element in the Church (Das dynamische in der Kirche, Frieburg, 1958, pp. 22–23) in “Existential Ethics: A Thomist Appraisal,” Thomist, 1963 (27), p. 507. The author treated this question briefly in his unpublished Master’s dissertation Existential Situation Ethics, De Paul University, 1965, p. 134.
G. Bastide, Traité, p. 233. Cf. also Mirages et certitudes de la civilization, pp. 172–207.
Cf. G. Bastide, Traité, pp. 487–488.
J. Leclercq, La philosophie morale, p. 195.
Ibid., p. 257.
G. Bastide, “De la situation de l’homme,” p. 252.
J. Leclercq, Les grands lignes, p. 431.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koenig, T. (1971). Conclusions. In: The Philosophy of Georges Bastide. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3045-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3045-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3047-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3045-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive