Skip to main content

Abstract

This study is conceived of as an effort to apply the systems approach developed by Karl Deutsch in his Nerves of Government 1 to the study of international politics. When work was started on this project, Deutsch’s general statement about political processes found in Nerves of Government appeared to this author as a most unique and important theoretical initiative in political science. Deutsch’s work was an effort to respond to the increasingly complex style of modem life. He attempted to develop a new approach to politics that would combine traditional scholarship with the more modem findings of science. The product of his effort, Nerves of Government, was not a completed study. Instead it was an “interim report” that Deutsch hoped would eventually lead to a “theory of politics, both national and international.”2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Karl W. Deutsch, The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control ( New York: Free Press, 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 25

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 27

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 28

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A good description of these changes is given by Charles A. McClelland, Theory and the International System. ( New York: Macmillan and Company, 1966 ), pp. 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karl W. Deutsch, The Analysis of International Relations ( Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1968 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  10. James C. Charlesworth, ed., A Design for Political Science: Scope, Objective, and Methods ( Philadelphia: American Association of Political and Social Science, 1966 ), pp. 170–171.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nerves of Government p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norbert Wiener, “Cybernetics in History,” in Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Walter Buckley, ed., ( Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1968 ), pp. 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Wiener, Cybernetics ( New York: John Wiley and Sons and the Technology Press, 1948 )

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Wiener, The Human Use of Human Beings ( New York: Doubleday and Company, 1954 )

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karl W. Deutsch, “Toward a Cybernetic Model of Man and Society,” in Buckley, op. cit., p. 388.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid. p. 389.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nerves of Government, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid. p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid. p. 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid. p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid. p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stafford Beer, “Below the Twilight Arch: A Mythology of Systems,” General System Yearbook, VI (1961), pp. 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid. p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid. p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eugene J. Meehan, Explanation in Social Science: A System Paradigm ( Home-wood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1968 ), p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Quoted in Nerves of Government, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  36. The Analysis of International Relations, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nerves of Government, p. 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nerves of Government, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nerves of Government, p. 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid., p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid., p. 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid., p. 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., p. 101–202.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 98, 200, 202.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid., p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ludwig von Bertalanffy, “General System Theory — A critical Review,” in Modern System Research for the Behavioral Scientist, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See Chapter II, pp. 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid., p. 183. This Wiener’s concept which Deutsch does not employ.

    Google Scholar 

  54. The Strangelove Case,” in Roger Hilsman. To Move A Nation ( New York: Dell Publishers, 1967 ), pp. 222–223

    Google Scholar 

  55. Deutsch expresses this thought throughout his work and it may be summed up in his belief that “politics is… a decisive instrumentality.” Nerves of Government, p.243.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hilsman, op. cit., p.228.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Graham T. Allison, Bureaucracy and Policy: Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis (forthcoming); A. Horelick, “The Cuban missile Crisis: An Analysis of Soviet Calculations and Behavior,” World Politics (April, 1964 )

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hilsman, Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chadwick J. Haberstroh, “Control as an Organizational Process,” Management Science, 6 (1960), p. 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. John W. Burton, Conflict and Communication: The Use of Controlled Communication in International Relations ( New York: The Free Press, 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See Chapter IV, pp. 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Vickers, op. cit., p. 472.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ernest B. Haas, Tangle of Hopes: American Commitments and World Order ( Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969 ), p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid., p.241.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hilsman Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Nerves of Government, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Nerves of Government, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ernst B. Haas, “Toward Controlling International Change: A Personal Plea,” World Politics, XVII (1964), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nerves of Government, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ibid., p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  76. This I speculate as a possibility. Deutsch only barely hints at the implications in Nerves of Government, pp. 242–244.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Johan Galtung, “On the Future of the International System,” Journal of Peace Research, IV (1967), p, 306.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ibid., p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryen, S.D. (1971). Cybernetic Analysis and Political Study. In: The Application of Cybernetic Analysis to the Study of International Politics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3005-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3005-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3007-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3005-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics