Abstract
Malebranche gave up the notion that interaction occurred between mind and body. Like Foucher, numerous Cartesians thought that this interaction was obvious and thus retained it in their expositions of Cartesianism. These philosophers who do not offer occasionalist solutions to Cartesian problems are referred to as orthodox Cartesians, though there is no insistence upon the term, orthodox. As a matter of fact, these philosophers did consider themselves to be orthodox expositors of Cartesianism in contrast to someone like Malebranche who went so far as to assert that he was not a strict Cartesian. However, the orthodox Cartesians could not retain all the principles which seemed to underlie Cartesianism. They retained the strict dualism between mind and matter, and thus could explain interaction only by dispensing with the causal likeness principle. Concurrently, in order to contend that mind could know matter which was utterly different from it, they also had to deny the epistemological likeness principle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1966 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watson, R.A. (1966). The Orthodox (Non-Occasionalist) Cartesian Way of Ideas. In: The Downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712. Archives Internationales D’Histoire Des Idees / International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2962-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2962-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0187-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2962-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive