Abstract
The origins of the Congress of Verona are as important as they are obscure, stretching back, as they do, to the Laibach conference of 1821. There, on February 25, while the Austrian expedition was marching through the Papal States, the three eastern powers resolved to reunite at Florence in September of the following year to discuss Italian affairs. In April, after the revolts in Naples and Piedmont had been suppressed, the allies reaffirmed this decision and announced that the Florentine congress specifically would determine whether Austrian forces in these kingdoms should be continued, diminished, or withdrawn. For more than a year, the great powers assumed that this would be an Italian conference, since Austria had successfully opposed placing the Spanish revolution on its agenda, and Russian objections had effectively proscribed collective consideration of the Turko-Greek conflict.2 Nonetheless, the statement is made repeatedly that the Congress of Verona was summoned originally to debate the Spanish and Greek revolutions. To make this assertion is simply to retroject later developments.3
Himself his moldering monument survives,
And sees his labors perish while he lives;
His fame is more contracted than his span,
And the frail author dies before the man.
How would he wish the labor to forbear
And follow other arts with more successful care?
Vida.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Frederick B. Artz, Reaction and Revolution, 1814–1832 (New York, 1934), p. 165.
Henry A. Kissinger, A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822 (Boston, 1957), pp. 309–310.
George M. Trevelyan,British History in the Nineteenth Century and After, 1782–1919 (London, 1947), p. 208.
Dexter Perkins, A History of the Monroe Doctrine (new ed.; Boston, 1955), p. 34.
René Albrecht-Carrié, A Diplomatic History of Europe since the Congress of Vienna (New York, 1958), p. 28.
Panfilo Gentile, “Chateaubriand politico,” Studi politici, IV (1956), 19.
André Nicolle, “Ouvrard and the French Expedition in Spain in 1823,” Journal of Modern History (hereafter cited as JMH), XVII (Sept. 1945), 193.
Sir John A. R. Marriott, Castlereagh: The Political Life of Robert, Second Marquess of Londonderry (London, 1936), pp. 311–312.
Augustus Granville Stapleton, Political Life of the Right Honourable George Canning (2nd ed.; London, 1831), II, 36 (Stapleton was Canning’s private secretary.).
Harriet Martineau,A History of the Thirty Year’s Peace: 1816–1846 (London, 1877).
William W. Kaufmann, British Policy and the Independence of Latin America, 1804–1828 (New Haven, Conn., 1951).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nichols, I.C. (1971). The Diplomatic Background of the Congress. In: The European Pentarchy and the Congress of Verona, 1822. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2725-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2725-0_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1110-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2725-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive