Abstract
The modern discussion of the philosophy of space and time continues in the pattern set by the controversy between Leibniz and Newton. The positions in that controversy are usually identified by the labels ‘relational’ vs. ‘absolute’ and the opposition thus marked is generally taken to be between the conceptions of space as “a lattice of quantitative relations” and as “a unity which precedes and makes possible all relations that can be discovered in it.”1 Both positions, so described, are difficult to understand. There is, moreover, associated with each of them a special difficulty that I want to focus on, for these special difficulties will suggest a point of view that may aid our understanding of the controversy and its contemporary continuations.
I shall cite Adolf Grünbaum, Geometry and Chronometry in Philosophical Perspective (1968) as GCPP and my bracketed chapter and page references will be to this book. I want to take this opportunity to thank Professor Grünbaum for lively correspendence over the years and for making available to me the rough draft of a portion of some recent material of his that will contain careful and detailed reworkings of his position on space and time. Part of this material appenred in Grünbaum (1970).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Alexander, H. G. (ed.), The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, Philosophical Library, New York, 1956.
Carnap, R., Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Basic Books, New York, 1966.
Earman, J., ‘Space-Time’, Journal of Philosophy 37 (1970), 259–78.
Fine, A., ‘Physical Geometry and Physical Laws’, Philosophy of Science 31 (1964), 156–62.
Grünbaum, A., ‘Geometry, Chronometry and Empiricism’, in, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science III, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1962.
Grünbaum, A., Geometry and Chronometry in Philosophical Perspective, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1968.
Grünbaum, A., ‘Can We Ascertain the Falsity of a Scientific Hypothesis’, Studium Generale 22 (1969), 1061–93.
Grünbaum, A., ‘Space, Time and Falsifiability’, Philosophy of Science 37 (1970), 469–588.
Koyré, A., From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1957.
Lenzen, V., ‘Procedures of Empirical Science’, in International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 1 (1938), 12.
Massey, G. J., ‘A Panel Discussion on Grünbaum’s Philosophy of Science: Toward a Clarification of Grünbaum’s Conception of an Intrinsic Metric’, Philosophy of Science 36 (1969), 331–99.
Menger, K., Géometrie Générale, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1954.
Putnam, H., ‘An Examination of Grünbaum’s Philosophy of Geometry’, in Philosophy of Science: The Delaware Seminar 2, Interscience, New York, 1963.
Schlesinger, G., ‘It Is False that Overnight Everything Has Doubled in Size’, Philosophical Studies 15 (1964), 65–71.
Stein, H., ‘Newtonian Space-Time’, Texas Quarterly 10 (1967), 174–200.
van Fraassen, B., Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space, Random House, 1970.
Wiener, N., ‘The Relation of Space and Geometry to Experience’, The Monist 32 (1922), 12–60; 200–47; 364–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fine, A. (1973). Reflections on a Relational Theory of Space. In: Suppes, P. (eds) Space, Time and Geometry. Synthese Library. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2686-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2686-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2688-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2686-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive