Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 3))

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

Following the inception of General Relativity, a dialogue ensued between A. Einstein and E. Kretschmann concerning the status of the Principle of General Covariance. Einstein supposed it to have physical content whereas Kretschmann proved that all lawlike statements of physics are expressible in generally covariant form. Einstein finally concurred with Kretschmann. Subsequently, M. Bunge argued that all covariance principles are metatheoretical, i.e. their referents are not physical patterns but theories. However, recently, J. L. Anderson argued that the imposition of covariance requirements restricts the possible forms of the laws of a given theory, indicating that they do have physical content. We show that there is an element of truth in both positions. However, the dispute has rested on a confusion between principles of covariance and principles of relativity, the former being formal and the latter being physical. We distinguish between the covariance group and the relativity group of several theories in support of our contention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anderson, J. L.: 1967, Principles of Relativity Physics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1961, ‘Laws of Physical Laws’, Am. J. Phys. 29, 518–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1967, Foundations of Physics, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1916, ‘Prinzipielles zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Ann. der Phys. 49, 769–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1918, ‘Prinzipielles zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Ann. der Phys. 55, 241–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmann, E.: 1917, ‘Über den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitäts-Postulate’, Ann. der Phys. 53, 575–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, C.: 1952, The Theory of Relativity, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noether, E.: 1918, ‘Invariante Variationsprobleme’, Goett. Nachr., 235–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, E. J.: 1962, Formal Structure of Electromagnetics, North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, E. J.: 1967, General Covariance in Electromagnetism, in M. Bunge (ed.), Delaware Seminar in the Foundations of Physics, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Angel, R.B. (1973). Relativity and Covariance. In: Bunge, M. (eds) The Methodological Unity of Science. Theory and Decision Library, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2667-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2667-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0404-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2667-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics