Abstract
Kant’s interpretation of the mathematics of motion is to be found in his Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science in the form of one fundamental principle of kinematics and three laws of mechanics. None of these propositions is especially original with Kant so far as the sheer mathematics goes, but the selection of just these four propositions and Kant’s proof for each of them are at the very least strongly influenced by the special features of his critical philosophy. Before turning to details I should like to consider what Kant takes to be the significance and usefulness of the subject of metaphysical foundations of natural science (which in its strictest, and for Kant, most proper sense, is the metaphysical doctrine of corporeal nature). Kant’s claims are, as usual, in one sense very modest and in another sense magnificently presumptuous: modest in that he thinks his achievement “no great work” [kein grosses Werk]; presumptuous in that he believes himself to have once and for all exhaustively investigated his subject. In any case, Kant does claim that all mathematical physicists, however much they may seek to ‘repudiate any claim of metaphysics on their science’, must, at least implicitly, make use of the principles which he is about to elucidate.
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (Grant GS 2413). I am indebted for several helpful discussions to Dr. Jürgen Ehlers of the Max Planck Institute in Munich.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
de Vleeschauwer, H.-J., The Development of Kantian Thought (translated by A. R. C. Duncan), T. Nelson, London, 1962.
Dugas, R., A History of Mechanics (translated by J. R. Maddox), Central Book, New York, 1955.
Felix, L., The Modern Aspect of Mathematics (translated by J. H. and F. H. Hlavaty), Basic Books, New York, 1960.
Fock, V., The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation (2nd ed., translated by N. Kemmer), Macmillan, New York, 1964.
Grünbaum, A., Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, Knopf, New York, 1963.
Hankins, T., ‘The Reception of Newton’s Second Law of Motion in the Eighteenth Century’, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 20 (1967), 43–65.
Hermann, J., Phoronomia, sive de viribus et motibus corporum solidorum et fluidorum R. & G. Wetstenios, Amsterdam, 1716.
Kant, I., Neurer Lehrbegriff der Bewegung und Ruhe (1758), Akademie ed., II. 13–25.
Kant, I. Prolegomena and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (translated by E. B. Bax), Bell, London, 1883.
Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason (translated by N. K. Smith), Macmillan, New York, 1933.
Land, J., ‘Kant’s Space and Modern Mathematics’, Mind 2 (1877), 38–46.
Lavoisier, A-L., Elements of Chemistry (translated by R. Kerr), William Creech, Edinburgh, 1790. Reprinted by Dover, New York, 1965.
Leibniz, G.W., ‘The Theory of Abstract Motion (1671)’, in L. Loemker (ed.), Philosophical Papers and Letters, Vol. 1, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1956.
Leibniz, G. W., ‘Specimen Dynamicum (1695)’, in L. Loemker (ed.), Philosophical Papers and Letters, Vol. 2, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1956.
Meyerson, E., Identity and Reality (translated by K. Loewenberg), George Allen & Unwin, London, 1930.
Newton, I., Principia (translated by F. Cajori), University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1946.
Palter, R., ‘Absolute Space and Absolute Motion in Kant’s Critical Philosophy,’ Synthese 23 (1971), 47–62. Reprinted in L. Beck (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1972, pp. 172–87.
Reichenbach, H., Philosophy of Space and Time (translated by M. Reichenbach and J. Freund), Dover, New York, 1958.
Schrickx, W., ‘Coleridge Marginalia in Kant’s Metaphysische Anfangsgriinde der Naturwissenschaft’, Studia Germanica Gandensia 1 (1959), 161–187.
Scott, W. L., ‘The Significance of Hard Bodies in the History of Scientific Thought’, Isis 50 (1959), 199–210.
Stein, H., ‘Newtonian Space-Time’, Texas Quarterly 10 (1967), 174–200. Reprinted in R. Palter (ed.), The annus mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton 1666–1966, The M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970, pp. 258–284.
von Helmholtz, H., ‘The Origin and Meaning of Geometrical Axioms’, Mind 1 (1876), 301–321.
von Helmholtz, H., ‘The Origin and Meaning of Geometrical Axioms (II)’, Mind 3 (1878), 212–225.
Wallis, J., ‘A Summary Account Given by Dr. John Wallis, of the General Laws of Motion’, Transactions of the Royal Society 3 (1668), 864–66.
Wren, C., ‘Theory Concerning the Same Subject… lex naturae de collisione corporum’, Transactions of the Royal Society 3 (1668), 867–8.
Zweig, A. (ed.), Kant: Philosophical Correspondence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palter, R. (1973). Kant’s Formulation of the Laws of Motion. In: Suppes, P. (eds) Space, Time and Geometry. Synthese Library, vol 56. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2650-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2650-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2652-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2650-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive