Abstract
The potential and charge density distributions are derived quite generally for both a stationary charged sphere and a charged body moving rapidly through a plasma. The work of previous authors on the screening of stationary charged bodies has been limited by a failure to recognize the importance of spiral orbits on the space charge density and a failure to cope with the problem of bound orbits. Most of the previous work on the screening of rapidly moving bodies has been limited to cases where the body, the potential, or the Debye length are assumed small. In the few cases where these assumptions have not been made, iterative solutions have been calculated, but here the uniqueness of the solution is seriously in question.
We have calculated the potential and charge density as a function of position about a stationary charged sphere, using both monoenergetic and Maxwellian velocity distributions for the ions and electrons of the ambient plasma. The potential decreases with distance more slowly than in the case of local thermodynamic equilibrium; the density of the ions (if the body is negative, electrons if positive) is generally much smaller than given by the barometric formula and varies in a complicated way. We also calculate the ion and electron voltage-current probe characteristics and the equilibrium potential as a function of the radius of the body. We find the Mott-Smith and Langmuir equations for the ion current (if the body is negative, electrons if positive) are unsatisfactory unless the sheath thickness is expressed as a function of the potential and radius of the body. For a spherical body, the appropriate expression for the sheath thickness a is found to be σ = 1.17ψ s 1/2ϱ s 1/3 −0.34ψ c 1/2ϱ c 1/3 inside the pericritical surface and 0.83ψ s 1/2ϱ s 1/3 outside the pericritical surface, where ψ s and ϱ s are the nondimensional potential and radius for the body, and ψ c , ϱ c are the values of these quantities on the pericritical surface.
Eigenvalue solutions are obtained if the charged body neutralizes most of the ions and electrons that strike its surface; i.e., if the reflection coefficients for the surface of the body are small. Under these conditions, the potential is found to vary more slowly than r−2 for small values of the potential.
For a rapidly moving body, we have developed a self-consistent method for solving the screening problem which does not require iterative calculations. Equations for the solution of the screening of axially symmetric bodies are derived for plasmas in which the thermal motion of the ions can be neglected and for plasmas with a Maxwellian velocity distribution. We have calculated the potential and density variation in the wake, the probe characteristics, and the impact and electric drag characteristic curves for various bodies. These calculations show that there is a trough in the ion density surrounding a highly charged body. The drag calculations show that under certain conditions a negative drag is obtained if the potential on the body is large and if the ions are neutralized and elastically reflected at the surface of the body.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beard, D. B. and Johnson, F. S.: 1960, J. Geophys. Res. 65, 1.
Beard, D. B. and Johnson, F. S.: 1961, J. Geophys. Res. 66, 12.
Bernstein, I. B. and Rabinowitz, I. N.: 1958, Project Matterhorn Report PM-S-38.
Bettinger, R. T. and Walker, E. H.: 1965, Phys. Fluids 8, 748–751.
Davis, A. H. and Harris, I.: 1961 in L. Talbot (ed.), Rarefield Gas Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 691–699.
Fowler, H. A. and Farnsworth, L. E.: 1958, Phys. Rev. 111, 103.
Hagstrum, H.: 1954, Phys. Rev. 96, 325.
Jastrow, R. and Pearse, C. A.: 1957, J. Geophys. Res. 62, 3.
Kraus, L. and Watson, K. M.: 1958, Phys. Fluids 1, 480.
Laframboise, J. G.: 1966, Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto, UTIAS Report No. 100.
Lundgren, T. S. and Chang, C. C.: 1963, Aerospace Corporation Report No. ATN-63 (9226)-2.
Mott-Smith, H. M. and Langmuir, I.: 1926, Phys. Rev. 28, 727.
Öpik, E. J.: 1964, in S. F. Singer (ed.), Interactions of Space Vehicles with an Ionized Atmosphere (Am. Astronaut. Soc. Symp., March 1961), Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 3–60.
Pitaevskii, L. P.: 1963, AIAA 1, 994.
Rand, S.: 1959, Phys. Fluids 2, 265.
Spitzer, L.: 1956, Physics of Fully Ionized Gases, Intersciene, New York.
Walker, E. H.: 1965, in S. F. Singer (ed.), Interaction of Space Vehicles with an Ionized Atmosphere, Pergamon Press, London, pp. 61–162.
Wasserstrom, E., Su, C. H., and Probstein, R. F.: 1964, Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, MIT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Walker, E.H. (1973). Plasma Sheath and Screening of Charged Bodies. In: Grard, R.J.L. (eds) Photon and Particle Interactions with Surfaces in Space. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 37. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2647-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2647-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2649-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2647-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive