Skip to main content

On Separative-Conditional Propositions

  • Chapter
The Propositional Logic of Avicenna

Part of the book series: Synthese Historical Library ((SYHL,volume 7))

  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

Now we must examine the other kind (of relation expressed in conditional propositions), i.e. conflict. We say: A proposition which ex- 5 presses conflict by merely talking of conflict as in saying This statement is in conflict with that’ is not conditional. Also, a conditional proposition which expresses conflict may not be necessarily separative, since it is possible for a connective proposition to express conflict. What expresses conflict in a (separative) sentence is its literal form, namely the word ‘either’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The edited text reads aw not wa.The editor does not give any further readings; but in consulting the B.M. MS. we found that the text reads wa.

    Google Scholar 

  2. This is case (1) which he calls ‘real conflict’.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Avicenna uses the words ʿ mmāwa immāʾ, which can be literally translated as ‘Either … and either’, to express the separative proposition.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The text in fact says that the first case is not true of the last division; and that the second case is not true of the second division, which does not make sense.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See 404, 5-12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The text reads ‘the second’.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The text reads ‘the third’.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reading with the majority of MSS. wa.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For an explanation of the conjunctive and the exceptive syllogisms see 389 and 390, 1-5, and the Introduction, pp. 18-20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. There is no such reference in the book.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reading with F and J lā yakūnu instead of yakūnu.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reading qad yakūnu instead of yakūnu.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Avicenna does not discuss what modern logicians call conjunctive propositions though, as his sentence shows, he includes them with conditional propositions.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shehaby, N. (1973). On Separative-Conditional Propositions. In: The Propositional Logic of Avicenna. Synthese Historical Library, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2624-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2624-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2626-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2624-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics