Abstract
Our problem is to ascertain whether or not contemporary science lends any support to realism, materialism, and dialectics. Before embarking on an investigation of the performace of these three doctrines we shall sketch them, or rather certain versions of them. We shall then take a glimpse at their place in (a) the set of philosophical presuppositions of scientific research, (b) certain current research programs and (c) some results of research. The upshot of our investigation will be that contemporary science presupposes critical realism and supports a variety of materialism that may be called dynamical and pluralistic. On the other hand it does not confirm dialectics. We shall also make a plea for the elaboration and systematization of both critical realism and dynamical materialism, as well as for the adoption of a thoroughly critical and modern attitude in philosophical investigation.
Presented to the Second All Union Congress on Philosophical Problems of Contemporary Natural Science, Moscow, December 1–4, 1970.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bunge, M. (1973). How do Realism, Materialism and Dialectics fare in Contemporary Science?. In: Method, Model and Matter. Synthese Library, vol 44. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2519-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2519-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2521-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2519-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive