Abstract
Professor Hintikka in his highly suggestive paper made a good case for the possible fruitful application of modal logic and semantics of possible worlds to contemporary linguists’ studies of language. Hintikka made his point by offering a clear critique of linguists’ claims and then providing ways of dealing with issues at hand from the point of view of logical semantical theory. Now the purpose of my comments here is not intended to make a defense of any linguists’ view or to advance their views in a better context, but on the contrary, to lay bare certain fundamental problems in the interpretation of the possible-worlds semantical approach and to suggest possible lines of solution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, CY. (1973). Comments on Hintikka’s Paper. In: Hintikka, K.J.J., Moravcsik, J.M.E., Suppes, P. (eds) Approaches to Natural Language. Synthese Library, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2506-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2506-5_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0233-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2506-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive