Skip to main content

Relations of Peripheral Action Potentials and Cortical Evoked Potentials to the Magnitude of Sensation

  • Chapter
Sensation and Measurement

Abstract

The magnitude of sensation is related to the stimulus according to Stevens’ psychophysical “power” law Ψ = k(φ − φ 0)n. Peripheral action potentials and central electric responses have both been examined for a possible parallelism. According to Mountcastle, somatosensory receptors impose the power law on the number or the frequency of impulses in the primary sensory neurons and higher-order neurons respond linearly to this input. Davis, however, found poor correspondence in auditory nerve of guinea pig, using number of active fibers as the measure.

The slow cortical V-potential response increases too slowly with increasing stimulus magnitude to determine whether the relation is linear, power law or more complex, and other properties of the V potential differ widely from sensation. A new experiment with constant stimuli, relates ratings of sensation magnitude to amplitude of individual V potentials. The correlation is about +0.20, very low but significant. The V potential does not seem to arise close to the physiological substrate of sensation.

This research was supported in full by a U.S. Public Health Service, Department of Health, Education and Welfare research grant NS03856 from the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Davis, H. Peripheral coding of auditory information. In W. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory Communication, 1961, Ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., Mast, T., Yoshie, N., & Zerlin, S. The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: Recovery process. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1966, 21, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., Hirsh, S. K., Shelnutt, J., & Bowers, C. Further validation of evoked response audio-metry (ERA). Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1967, 10, 717–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., Bowers, C., & Hirsh, S. K. Relations of the human vertex potential to acoustic input: Loudness and masking. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 1968, 43, 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., Osterhammel, P. A., Wier, C. C., & Gjerdingen, D. B. Slow vertex potentials: Interactions among auditory, tactile, electric and visual stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1972, 33, 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. A. Effects of acoustic stimuli on the waking human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1939, 2, 494–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmedt, J. E. Auditory-evoked potentials from cochlea to cortex as influenced by activation of the efferent olivo-cochlear bundle. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 1962, 34, 1478–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donchin, E., & Lindsley, D. B. (Eds.) Average evoked potentials: Methods, results and evaluations. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration SP-191, 1969. Ch. 2, 4, and 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S.A., Squires, K. C., Bauer, J. W., & Lindsay, P. H. Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection. Science, 1971, 172, 1357–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, S. K., & Wier, C. C. Personal communication based on unpublished experiments. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keidel, W.D., & Spreng, M. Neurophysiological evidence for the Stevens power function in man. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965, 38, 191–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCandless, G. A., & Rose, D. E. Evoked cortical responses to stimulus change. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle, V. B. The problem of sensing and the neural coding of sensory events. In The Neurosciences: A study program, 1967, pp. 393–408. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H., Darian-Smith, I. & Kornhuber, H. H. Neural basis of the sense of flutter-vibration. Science, 1967, 155, 597–600. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H., & Hornhuber, H. H. The neural transformation of mechanical stimuli delivered to the monkey’s hand. In De Reuch & Knight (Eds.), Touch, Heat and Pain. A Ciba Foundation Symposium. London: J. & A. Churchill, 1966, pp. 325–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H., Sakata, H., & Hyvärinen, J. Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1969, 32, 452–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. L., & Tanenholtz, S. D. Effect of increments in a sinusoidal pedestal on the vertex potential. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1970, 47, 97. (Abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. The psychophysics of sensory function. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory Communication, 1961, Ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohr, P. E., & Goldring, S. Origin of somatosensory evoked scalp responses in man. Journal of Neurosurgery, 1969, 31, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanis, D. C. A signal-detection analysis of auditory evoked potentials in an intensity discrimination task. (Doctoral dissertation, Washington University) St. Louis, Mo., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, H. G. Jr., & Ritter, W. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1970, 28, 360–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. S., Davis, H. & Hirsh, S. K. Relations between stimulus intensity, subjective magnitude and the cortical evoked response. Paper presented at the 13th meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, G., & Mountcastle, V. B. Neural activity in mechanoreceptive cutaneous afferents: Stimulus-response relations, Weber functions, and information transmission. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965, 28, 359–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, G., & Mountcastle, V. B. Quantitative relations between mechanical stimuli to the skin and neural responses evoked by them. In D. R. Kenshalo (Ed.), The Skin Senses. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1965, pp. 112–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerlin, S., & Davis, H. The variability of single evoked vertex potentials in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1967, 23, 468–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, H. (1974). Relations of Peripheral Action Potentials and Cortical Evoked Potentials to the Magnitude of Sensation. In: Moskowitz, H.R., Scharf, B., Stevens, J.C. (eds) Sensation and Measurement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2245-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2245-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2247-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2245-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics