Skip to main content

Explanation and Evolution

  • Chapter
The Understanding of Nature

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 23))

Abstract

I want to discuss some problems about explanation in biology. The leading question about biological explanation has been the question whether, and if so how, it differs from explanation in other fields. Many claims and counterclaims are made by biologists as well as philosophers in this connection. I want to examine in particular the claim of Francisco Ayala that biology is irreducible to physics and chemistry because, and only because, of the teleological structure of evolutionary theory.1 But to reflect on Ayala’s claim I must have some notion of what makes a theory in general explanatory and also some notion of what makes an explanation teleological. While I can’t claim to have a pat answer on either of these puzzles (especially the former!), let me make some preparatory remarks about both before looking at the alleged teleology of evolutionary theory in relation to its explanatory force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Francisco Ayala, ‘Biology as an Autonomous Science’, Amer. Sci. 56 (1968) 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1958; The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, New York, p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marjorie Grene, The Knower and the Known, Univ. of Calif. Press, 1974, Ch. 9; cf. Chapter IX of this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I am grateful to Professor Lorenz Krüger of the University of Bielefeld for his criticism of an earlier version of my argument at this point.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Theodosius Dobzhansky, The Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York, 1970, pp. 261–66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ernst Mayr, Populations, Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970, pp. 126–127.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. G. L. Stebbins and R. C. Lewontin, ‘Comparative Evolution at the Levels of Molecules, Organisms and Populations’, Proceedings 6th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability 5 (1971), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Professor Lynn Margulis of Boston University and Professor Stephen Jay Gould of Harvard University have kindly read and criticized parts of my MS in an earlier version.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grene, M. (1974). Explanation and Evolution. In: The Understanding of Nature. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2224-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2224-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0463-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2224-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics