Advertisement

PSA 1972 pp 103-115 | Cite as

Randomness and Knowledge

  • J. Alberto Coffa
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 20)

Abstract

Until recently, the debate concerning whether chance, randomness and disorder are ever instantiated in Nature has been considerably one-sided. Since Aristotle, the mainstream of philosophical thought seems to have been nearly unanimous in agreeing that these characters exist only ‘in the mind’. The shared conviction that every event has a cause or a determining condition led most philosophers who addressed themselves to the topic to the conclusion that there is no randomness in things.

Keywords

Probabilistic Weight Reference Class Rational Belief Knowledge Situation Epistemic Attribute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    Bridgman, P. W., ‘How much Rigor is Possible in Physics?’, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), The Axiomatic Method, North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1959.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Church, A., ‘The Concept of a Random Sequance’, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 46 130–135.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hempel, C., ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’, in [4].Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hempel, C., Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays, The Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hempel, C., ‘Deductive Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vo. III, University of Minnesota Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Landsberg, P. T., ‘Time in Statistical Physics and in Special Relativity’, Studium Generale 23 (1970) 1108–1158.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Loveland, D. W., Recursively Random Sequences, Ph.D. dissertation, microfilms, University of Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Loveland, D. W., ‘A New Interpretation of the von Mises Concept of a Random Sequence’, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 12 (1966) 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Loveland, D. W., ‘On Minimal Program Complexity Measures’, ACM Symposium on Theory Computing, 1969, pp. 61–66.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Mises, R. von, Probability, Statistics and Truth, 2nd. ed., Allen and Unwin, 1957.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Mises, R. von, ‘On the Foundations of Probability and Statistics’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12 (1941) 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Mises, R. von, Mathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics, The Academic Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Reichenbach, H., The Theory of Probability, University of California Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schnorr, C. P., ‘A Unified Approach to the Definition of Random Sequence’, Mathematical Systems Theory 5 (1971), 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Wald, A., ‘Über die Widerspruchsfreiheit des Kollektivbegriffes’, Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums 8 (1937) 38–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Alberto Coffa
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of History and Philosophy of ScienceIndiana UniversityIndia

Personalised recommendations