Advertisement

PSA 1972 pp 195-207 | Cite as

On Popper’s Philosophy of Social Science

  • N. Koertge
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 20)

Abstract

Partly through reading the works of Paul Feyerabend1 I have become intrigued with the following questions:
  1. (1)

    Is it possible to have a non-trivial theory of scientific method — that is, a fairly detailed and comprehensive theory of the best way(s) to try to increase and improve our knowledge? It is possible to have a unified theory which would apply both to physical science and social science, and perhaps even to technological innovation as well?

     
  2. (2)

    If we could find such a theory of the scientific process, how would it have to be modified if we were to decide that our aim were not just ultimately to understand the would (i.e., to find well-tested explanatory theories of high empirical content) but also continually to change the world — to improve the human condition?

     

Keywords

Physical Science Unintended Consequence Scientific Explanation Empirical Content Methodological Individualism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See especially Paul K. Feyerabend, ‘Against Method’, in Analysis of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology (ed. by M. Radner and S. Winokur), Vol. IV, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. 1a.
    See especially Paul K. Feyerabend, ‘Against Method’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    See especially: Joseph Agassi, ‘The Nature of Scientific Problems and Their Roots in Metaphysics’, in The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Karl R. Popper (ed. by Mario Bunge), Free Press, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. Paul K. Feyerabend, ‘Problems of Empiricism, Part II’, in The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories (ed. by R. G. Colodny), University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Noretta Koertge, ‘Inter-Theoretic Criticism and the Growth of Science’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII (ed. by R. C. Buck and R. S. Cohen), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. Imre Lakatos, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Research Programmes’, in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (ed. by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave), Cambridge University Press, London, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Feyerabend, ‘Against Method’, op. cit.>, p. 76.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    Ibid.>, p. 105.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    Ibid.>, p. 116.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. W. N. Watkins, ‘Methodological Individualism and Social Tendencies’, in Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences (ed. by May Brodbeck), Macmillan, New York, 1968, pp. 269–280.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karl R. Popper, ‘La rationalité et le statut du principe de rationalité’, in Les Fondements Philosophique des Systèmes Economiques (ed. by E. M. Claassen), Paris 1967, p. 14.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reprinted in Karl R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1963, p. 124.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poverty of Historicism, p. 66.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Popper, ‘La Rationalité’, loc. cit.>, p. 145.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    For a full account of explanations using the Rationality Principle, see J. W. N. Watkins, ‘Imperfect Rationality’, in Explanation in the Behaviorial Sciences (ed. by R. Borger and F. Cioffi), Cambridge University Press, London, 1970, p. 173.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. W. N. Watkins, ‘Confirmable and Influential Metaphysics’, Mind, N. S.> 67 (1958) 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Koertge
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of History and Philosophy of ScienceIndiana UnviersityIndia

Personalised recommendations