Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 14))

Abstract

At the risk of being regarded a’ square’ and ‘reactionary’ I wish to defend, explicate, reformulate and’ salvage’ whatever seems valuable to me in the empiricist tradition in the philosophy of science. I am fully aware of the almost hostile vogue of ‘beating-up’ on the empiricists, a fashion that is still in full swing. My only consolation is the remark of a well-known British philosopher. When he visited us at the University of Minnesota a few years ago, he said to me: “Don’t worry Feigl, if you don’t catch the bus of philosophy the first time, just wait a while, it’ll come ‘round again!”. Since I was lucky enough to catch the bus of philosophical fashion some forty years ago, I hope to be lucky once again during the rest of my ‘natural life’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H. Feigl ‘Beyond Peaceful Coexistence’, in Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science (ed. by R. H. Stuewer) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, General Editors), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. R. Hanson, ‘Logical Positivism and the Interpretation of Scientific Theories’, in The Legacy of Logical Positivism (ed. by P. Achinstein and S. F. Barker), Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Carnap, The Logical Structure of the World (English translation by R. A. George), University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1969, originally published as Der Logische Aufbau der Welt, Weltkreis Verlag, Berlin-Schlachtensee, 1928 (later republished by F. Meiner, Leipzig).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. R. Popper, ‘Conjectural Knowledge: My Solution of the Problem of Induction’, in Revue Internationale de Philosophie 95-96 (1971), 167–197.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Feigl, ‘What Hume Might Have Said to Kant’, in Popper’s Festschrift, The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy (ed. by M. Bunge), The Free Press of Glencoe, and Macmillan, London, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. B. Braithwaite, Scientific Explanation, Harper & Row, New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Max Black, Models and Metaphors, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert S. Cohen Marx W. Wartofsky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feigl, H. (1974). Empiricism at Bay?. In: Cohen, R.S., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2128-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2128-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0378-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2128-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics