Advertisement

Isolation of the Speech Area

  • Norman Geschwind
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 16)

Abstract

The credit for discovering this remarkable patient and for studying her so carefully over many years goes to Dr. Fred Quadfasel, who also demonstrated her remarkable capacity for verbal learning. Without these astute clinical and experimental observations the subsequent post-mortem findings would have been of little use. Combining the two, however, made it possible to draw far-reaching theoretical conclusions from this experiment of nature. Perhaps the most important conclusion is that comprehension of language is not unitary. Thus this patient could complete common phrases, and could perform other discriminatory activities, while she failed at others. This conclusion is reinforced by other findings, e.g., some patients with severe comprehension deficits for questions and commands for the individual limbs may yet respond very well to commands carried out with the axial musculature, e.g., ‘sit down’, ‘stand up’ ‘walk’, etc.

Keywords

Spontaneous Speech Arcuate Fasciculus Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus ISOLA TION Speech Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Brain, R., Speech Disorders. Buttenvorth, Washington. 1961.Google Scholar
  2. Geschwind. N., ‘Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man’, Brain 88 (1965) 237–294, 585–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldstein, K., Die trantkortikalen Aphasien, Fischer, Jena. 1917.Google Scholar
  4. Goldstein, K., Die Lokalisation in der Grosshisnrmde, Springer, Berlin, 1927.Google Scholar
  5. Goldstein, K., Language and Language Disturbance, Grune & Stratton, New York, 1948.Google Scholar
  6. Hôcaen. H.. Dubois, J., and Marcie. P., ‘Aspects linguistiques des troubles de la vigilance au cours des lésions temporales anterointemes droite et gauche’, Neuropsychologic 5 (1967) 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klingler, J. and Gloor, P.. ‘Connections of the Amygdala and of the Anterior Temporal Cortex in the Human Brain’, J. Comp. Neurol. 115 (1960) 330–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lichtheim, L.. ‘On Aphasia’, Brain 7 (1885) 433–484.Google Scholar
  9. Segarra, J. M. and Quadfasel. F. A., ‘Destroyed Temporal Lobe-tips–Preserved Ability to Sing’, Proc. VU Int. Congr. Neurol. 2 (1961) 377.Google Scholar
  10. Stengel. E., ‘On Transcortical Aphasia’. Z. Ces. Neurol. Psychiat. 154 (1936) 778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stengel. E.. ‘A Clinical and Psychological Study of Echo Reactions’. J. Ment. Sci. 93 (1947) 598–612.Google Scholar
  12. Wetsenburg, T. and McBride, K. E.. Aphasia. Commonwealth Fund. New York, 1935.Google Scholar
  13. Yakovlev, P., ‘Paraplegia in Flexion of Cerebral Origin’, J. Neuropath. Exp. Neurol. 13 (1954) 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman Geschwind
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard Medical SchoolUSA

Personalised recommendations