Skip to main content

The First and the Second Synthesis

  • Chapter
  • 86 Accesses

Abstract

The term “dialectic” has already appeared at several points in our discussion. We will now look into the essence of dialectic as such. It is mandatory to explore the formal structure of the dialectical shifts as they emerge at different junctures of Hegel’s system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ferdinand De Saussure, Course in General Linguistic, ed. Bally — A. Sechehaye in collaboration with A. Reidlinger, tr. Wade Baskin (New York 1950), p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Claude Levi-Straus, The Savage Mind (La Pensée sauvage) (London 1962), p. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sophist, 253b.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. W., XVIII, pp. 222–223.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Consult: Eduard von Hartmann. Über die dialektische Methode. Zweite Auflage. Historisch-kritische Untersuchungen (Bad Sachsa 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Logikt, I, p. 53 (I. P. 81).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Logik, I, p. 53 (I, P. 82).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. George, Princip und Methode der Philosophie mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Hegel und Schleiermacher, Berlin 1842, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. E. Erdmann, Abhandlung über Leib und Seele, Eine Vorschule zu Hegels Philosophie des Geistes, Neue Ausgabe by Bolland (Leiden 1902) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Encykl. § 81.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Engels, Socialism, Utopian and Scientific (Chicago 1918) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Georg Lukács, “Zur Ontologie des Gesellschaftlichen Seins,” Neues Forum, Feb.-Mar., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Encykl. § 553–574.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See: Michael Kosok, “The Formalization of Hegel’s Dialectical Logic” in: International Philosophical Quarterly VI, 1966, pp. 596ff. The analysis of the temporal character of the dialectical system is to be found on pp. 606–607.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. J. Fichte, Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre, in: Fichtes Werke, ed. F. Medicus (Leipzig, n. d.), Vol. I, p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Logische Untersuchungen (Leipzig 1870), Vol. I, pp. 44, 56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. System und Methode in Hegels Philosophie, (Leipzig 1927) p. 329.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. E. Erdmann, Grundriss der Logik und Metaphysik, Halle 1864, § 80, Inhaltslosigkeit.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kr. d. r.V., B 130 (Kemp Smith, p. 152).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Cassirer, Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit (Berlin 1911), vd. II2, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Hartmann, Die Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, Zweiter Teil: Hegel (Berlin 1929), p. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. E. Erdmann, Grundriss, etc. § 10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Logik, I, p. 35 (64).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. W., XIX, pp. 684–685.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. W., X, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. W., IX, p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. W., IX, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. W., X, p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. W., VIII, p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Consult on this point the present author’s: Experience and its Systematization, Studies in Kant, The Hague, 1965, p. 164 (Second edition 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. W., I, p. 433.

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. W., II, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. W., XVII, pp. 111-112.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Consult: Robert Minder: “‘Herrlichkeit’ chez Hegel ou le Monde des Pères Souabes” in: Etudes Germaniques, Juillet-Décembre 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Logik, I, pp. 148–150 (I, 171, 173).

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. W., XV, pp. 252–253.

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. W., XV, p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  42. On problems related to Hegel’s Philosophy of Religion consult: Kenneth L. Schmitz, “Hegel’s Philosophy of Religion, Typology and Strategy” — The Review of Metaphysics, 1970 X 717ff.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See also: Michael Theunissen, Hegel’s Lehre vom absoluten Geist als theologisch-politischer Traktat, Berlin 1970. Theunissen tries to show that Hegel translated the trend of Christianity into Platonic and Aristotelian metaphysical concepts.

    Google Scholar 

  44. On the question of the relation between concepts and time, compare Kenley R. Dove, “Hegel’s Phenomenological Method,” The Review of Metaphysics, 1970, mainly p. 619. My own feeling is that the interpretation which leads to a view that there is not that much of a gap between the level of concept and the level of time is very much under the influence of the contemporary Existenz-Philosophy and the importance or even preponderance of time within the world view of that type of philosophy. There are signs, as at least one reader read them, that Hegel becomes a philosopher whose system is getting incorporated into different systems whose “primary intuition” differs from that of Hegel.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Karl Rosenkranz, System der Wissenschaft, Ein philosophisches Encheiridion, Königsberg 1850, p. 513.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rotenstreich, N. (1974). The First and the Second Synthesis. In: From Substance to Subject. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2077-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2077-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1655-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2077-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics