Skip to main content

Correlation and Totality

  • Chapter
From Substance to Subject
  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

Hegel’s well-known saying1 that mediation or detour is the way of the Spirit can be applied pointedly to the issue at hand — that the True is not substance but just as much subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S.W., XVII, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kr.d.r.V., A p. 356 (Kemp-Smith p. 338).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.W., XVII, p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Helmut Thielicke, “Was meint das Wort ‘Gott’? Über Relevanz und Verbindlichkeit des Theos in der Theologie,” in Studium Generale 23 (1970) p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kr.d.r.V., B pp. 434, 435, 602, 603, (Kemp Smith pp. 385, 489, 490).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kr.d.r.V., B 497 (Kemp Smith p. 426).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kr.d.r.V., B p. 671 (Kemp Smith p. 532).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Encykl. § 112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Logik, p. no (II, p. 116).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 113 (II, p. 119).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 119 (II, p. 125).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Logik, I, p. 87. (I, p. 113).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Logik, II, p. 125 (II, pp. 131).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prolegomena § 36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Logik, II, p. 125 (II, pp. 130–131).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. W., I, p. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Logik, II, p. 147 (II, p. 151).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Logik, II, p. 184 (II, p. 187).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Encykl. § 149.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., § 151.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Logik, I, p. 100 (I, p. 126); Consult: Encykl. § 151.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Logik, II, p. 185 (II, p. 187).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Logik, II, p. 187 (II, p. 189).

    Google Scholar 

  26. The preponderance of the essential element in the sum total of the correlation is stated by Karl Rosenkranz as follows: the categories of essence are concepts of reflection, that is to say, they can be thought as such without their opposites. See: Karl Rosenkranz, Metaphysik, Wissenschaft der Logik, 1. Teil, Königsberg, 1858, p. 279. Again, in emphasizing the primacy of substance Karl Rosenkranz observes that in German the term substance connotes the thing, die Sache. In the word Ursache (cause) that metaphysical character is even more prominent. Ibid., p. 453.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Consult: Andrew J. Reck: Substance, Subject and Dialectic, incl. in: Tulane Studies in Philosophy vol. ix, Studies in Hegel, Tulane University, New Orleans, 1960, pp. 109 ff. On the transition from Kant to Hegel related to the notion of Idea see the present author’s: Ideas and Ideal, incl. in: The Legacy of Hegel, Proceedings of the Marquette Symposium 1970, edited by J. J. O’Malley e.a. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1973 pp. 288 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rotenstreich, N. (1974). Correlation and Totality. In: From Substance to Subject. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2077-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2077-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1655-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2077-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics