Skip to main content

Conflicting Answers to the Social Questions

  • Chapter
Revolution and Reflection
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

The events of 1848–49 forced men not only to rethink their politics but also to confront more systematically a newer set of problems such as pauperism, crime, emigration, and the other consequences of urbanization, industrialization, and population growth. The “social questions,” which had already begun to agitate Germans during the 1840’s, received closer scrutiny from many writers after the upheavals at mid-century, even though the intellectuals who felt that these problems actually outweighed political ones in importance still remained in a minority.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. On the history of the phrase “die soziale Frage,” a direct translation from the French “la question sociale,” see Otto Ladendorf, Historisches Schlagwörterbuch (Strassburg and Berlin, 1906), 291.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Theodore S. Hamerow, Restoration, Revolution, Reaction (Princeton, 1958), 207–210, 241–242, and The Social Foundations of German Unification, 1858–1871: Ideas and Institutions (Princeton, 1969), 12–13, 20, 25, 27, 29, 41–43, 50, 54, 57, 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On arguments for free enterprise during the Vormärz, see Donald G. Rohr, The Origins of Social Liberalism in Germany (Chicago and London, 1963), 78–101; for similar sentiments during the 1860’s, see Hamerow, The Social Foundations of German Unification, 95–106, 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Landau, “Die materiellen Zustände der untern Classen in Deutschland sonst und jetzt,” in Germania, II, 625, 627; Biedermann, Frauen-Brevier, 347–348.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On Welcker and Biedermann before 1848, see Rohr, 112–116, 147–154; for the 1850’s, see Biedermann, Frauen-Brevier, 334 ff., 352–354. See Hans Rosenberg, Grosse Depression und Bismarckzeit (Berlin, 1967), 81, 127, on the effect of economic improvement on social protest in the 1850’s.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See the following studies on this current of German social thought: Hamerow, The Social Foundations of German Unification, 1858–1871: Ideas and Institutions 117–132, 200–221; William O. Shanahan, German Protestants Face the Social Question (Notre Dame, 1954), 239–301; Karl Valerius Herberger, Die Stellung der preussischen Konservativen zur sozialen Frage, 1848–62 (Meissen, 1914).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Riehl, Die bürgerliche Gesellschaft, 5, 273. Many highly appreciative pieces have been written about Riehl, but there is still no satisfactory full-scale treatment. There are interesting analyses of his ideas in Eckart Pankoke, Sociale Bewegung — Sociale Frage — Sociale Politik: Grundfragen der deutschen “Socialwissenschaft” im 19. Jahrhundert (Stuttgart, 1970), 61–66, 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fritz Wöhler, Joseph Edmund Jörg and die sozialpolitische Richtung im deutschen Katholizismus (Leipzig, 1929), 83; Wagener, “Vorwort,” 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franz Josef Stegmann, Von der ständischen Reform zur staatlichen Sozialpolitik: Der Beitrag der Historisch-politischen Blätter zur Lösung der sozialen Frage (Munich and Vienna, 1965), 51–52, 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  10. On Wagener, see the following: Wolfgang Saile, Hermann Wagener und sein Verhältniss zu Bismarck: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des konservativen Sozialismus (Tübingen, 1958), 44–52, 63; Shanahan, 272–280, 362 ff.; Herberger, passim. For the reference to competition, see Wagener, 9. See the following unsigned articles in the early volumes of Wagener’s Neues Conversations-Lexikon on the various estates of society: “Ackerbau,” “Adel,” and “Adels-Theorie und Adels-Reform,” in Vol. I (1859), 242–260, 321–373, 377–385; “Arbeit, Arbeitszeit,” in Vol. II (1859), 478488; “Bauer” and “Bauernstand,” in Vol. III (1860), 367–372, 383–388; “Bourgeoisie” and “Bürger, Bürgerstand, Bürgerthum,” in Vol. IV (1860), 358–366, 672–675.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ingwer Paulsen, Viktor Aimé Huber als Sozialpolitiker (2nd ed., Berlin, 1956), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huber, review of Riehl, 74–75. Huber’s criticisms of credit co-operatives were implicit, in that he never showed much interest in them. For his criticisms of production co-operatives, see his Ausgewählte Schriften, 824 ff. See Schulze-Delitzsch’s Assoziationsbuch für deutsche Handwerker and Arbeiter (Leipzig, 1853) for a good summary of his ideas. See Huber, “Die cooperative Association in Deutschland,” 78–83, for criticism of working-class militancy.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For biographical background, see Werner Schmidt, Lorenz von Stein (Eckenförde, 1956). For Stein’s ideas, see Heinz Nitzschke, Die Geschichtsphilosophie Lorenz von Steins (Munich and Berlin, 1932), and Pankoke, 75–99, 126–134.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid. cxiii-cxvii; Heinrich Künne, Lorenz von Stein und die arbeitende Klasse (Münster, 1926), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See the discussion of Frantz, Die Staatskrankheit, in Eugen Stamm, Konstantin Frantz’ Schriften und Leben, 1817–1856 (Heidelberg, 1907), 239–249; on Wagener, see Saile, 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard W. Reichard, Crippled from Birth: German Social Democracy, 18441870 (Ames, Iowa, 1969), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See G. D. H. Cole, A History of Socialist Thought, II (London, 1954), 14–31, for a comparative treatment of Rodbertus and Mario. Rodbertus and Lassalle are treated in Charles Gide and Charles Rist, A History of Economic Doctrines, trans. R. Richards (2nd English ed., London, 1948), 416–437.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., 6–8, 3, 72, 74–75, 79; Rodbertus, Zur Beleuchtung der socialen Frage, I (Berlin, 1875; a reprint, unchanged except for pagination, of the second and third of the Sociale Briefe), 54. On Rodbertus’ pre-1848 writings, see H[einrich] Dietzel, Karl Rodbertus, I (Jena, 1886), 5 ff., 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodbertus, Sociale Briefe, I, 6–7, 81, 43–46; F. Thorwart, Hermann SchulzeDelitzsch (Berlin, 1913), 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mario, Programm, 1–5; W. Ed. Biermann, Karl Georg Winkelblech (Karl Mario), I (Leipzig, 1909), 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lees, A. (1974). Conflicting Answers to the Social Questions. In: Revolution and Reflection. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2065-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2065-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1638-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2065-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics