Skip to main content

Preliminary Reflections on the Open Society: Bergson, Popper, Voegelin

  • Chapter

Abstract

Let me briefly explain why I chose to begin our conference with a consideration of Bergson, Popper, and Voegelin. So far as I am aware, it was Henri Bergson who first employed the term “the open society” in print, in a book published in French in 1932 and translated into English in 1935.1 After Bergson, it is logical to move to Karl Popper’s The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945), which did so much to give the phrase wide currency in the English-speaking world, but which differs from Bergson’s treatment in significant respects. Finally, Eric Voegelin, consciously drawing inspiration from but also modifying Bergson, has made the “open society” a key concept in his important philosophy of history in his magnum opus now in progress, Order and History, and in other writings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Henri Bergson, Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion (Paris, Felix Alcan, 1932), translated as Two Sources of Morality and Religion by R. A. Andra and C. Brereton (New York, Holt, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., pp. 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid. Emphasis added.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., pp. 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid. p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., pp. 54, 68. Plotinus in particular is hailed as a representative of the open society. Bergson does not entirely ignore non-Western contributions (he cites Buddhism, for example), but his discussion is insufficient to indicate their quality and extent.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid., p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid., p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gerhard Niemeyer, Between Nothingness and Paradise (Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1971), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bergson, Two Sources, p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., p. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  38. John H. Hallowell, The Moral Foundations of Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bergson, Two Sources, p. 272.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid., p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid., p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., p. 276.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 301.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid., p. 298.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., p. 296.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., p. 306 (End).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Karl R. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1950), Preface, p. ix. (In two parts: all but the final quotation are from Part I.)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid., I, Notes, p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid., I, pp. 174–175.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid., p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid. Popper does not elaborate on this last reference to “spiritual bonds.” Did he foresee a new religiousness?

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid., p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., p. 175. One page later, however, he makes the puzzling statement that the “revolution was not made consciously,” but was the result of “population growth” and rapid social change. What is philosophy if it is not self-conscious thought?

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ibid., p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ibid., p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid., p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ibid., p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ibid., p. 194. Antisthenes, of course, was the founder of the Cynic School. It is rather surprising to see Popper hailing the founder of Cynicism, who delighted in iconoclasm and exhibitionism, as a champion of “rational criticism.” See L. Edelstein, The Meaning of Stoicism (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1966), for a discussion of Antisthenes.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ibid., p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ibid., p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid., pp. 200–201.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ibid., p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid., II, end.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Eric Voegelin, “Immortality: Experience and Symbol,” 40 Harvard Theological Review (July, 1967), pp. 235–279, at 239.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Voegelin, “Equivalences of Experience and Symbolization in History,” unpublished ms., p. 7. (To be published in Volume IV of Order and History Louisiana State University Press. I am most appreciative of Professor Voegelin’s willingness to share this essay with me.)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Voegelin, Order and History, II: The World of the Polis (3 volumes, Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 1957), p. 1. “The initial leap in being, the break with the order of the myth, occurs in a plurality of parallel instances, in Israel and Hellas, in China and India….” Ibid., p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Gregor Sebba, “The ‘Leap in Being’. Eric Voegelin’s Construction of History,” unpublished ms., pp. 1–2. (To be published in the Proceedings of the Symposium in honor of Voegelin, University of Notre Dame, April 28–29, 1971.)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ibid., p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Voegelin, Order and History, II, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Voegelin, Order and History, I: Israel and Revelation (3 volumes, Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 1956), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Henri Bergson, Two Sources of Morality and Religion, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Germino, D. (1974). Preliminary Reflections on the Open Society: Bergson, Popper, Voegelin. In: Germino, D., Von Beyme, K. (eds) The Open Society in Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2056-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2056-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1630-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2056-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics