Abstract
There were neither victors nor vanquished in the historical controversy. Both Reformed and Catholic were baffled or compromised by the historical material, and both suffered irremediable losses. In the immediate political context, the Catholics had the upper hand. The revocation of the Edict of Nantes took place with little opposition, and Louis XIV remained convinced that he had done the right thing. Catholic polemicists could thus congratulate themselves for whatever effect their writings had in preparing the French for the Revocation, and the Reformed were denied all practical consolation. In the years to come, however, certain events, and the later elaboration of the debates, tended to modify the initial verdict, giving some vindication to the Protestant cause.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perry, E.I. (1973). Justification by History. In: From Theology to History: French Religious Controversy and the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes. Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idees/International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 67. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2009-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2009-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2011-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2009-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive