Abstract
In this and the next two chapters we are to give an idea of how a style may be defined with relative precision by means of our seven axes of bias. We have chosen “romanticism” for study because this seems to be both an important concept and also a singularly vague one as it is currently employed.1 It is therefore a good test case for our purposes. I propose to try to show (1) that the seven biases leave distinguishable traces in the culture of the period, marking different types of theoretical behavior in characteristically different ways, and (2) that it is possible to reach substantial agreement among observers regarding the presence or the absence of these marks in specific poems, philosophical writings, and other cultural products. Thus (it is my contention) an analysis in terms of our several axes has the following advantage: a very vague and loose notion of romanticism is replaced by a relatively precise and relatively operational definition — a definition that first specifies each of a number of “romantic characteristics,” or “marks,” by designating a certain range of positions on a given axis, and then formulates instructions for ascertaining whether a particular poem or other work of art has, or lacks, the marks in question.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, W.T. (1973). The Romantic Syndrome: Poetry. In: The Romantic Syndrome. International Scholars Forum, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1979-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1979-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0382-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1979-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive