Abstract
In his book The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics Sneed analyzes the structure of a theory of mathematical physics through informal axiomatization. According to Sneed, a theory of mathematical physics is characterized by a matrix for the theory, which “‘determines’ the sort of mathematical entities the theory is going to employ”, and four other entities: the set of models, the frame, the core, and the expanded core of the theory. The latter entities are, in a sense, restrictions of the matrix determined by basic axiomatic considerations and by considerations determining the empirical content of the theory. Each of these entities, the matrix as well as the other four, are set-theoretically characterized in their general properties.
I wish to thank H.-H. Lieb for pointing out some problems in the original version of the article and helping me to work out some revisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Chomsky, N., 1955, The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, mimeographed, MIT– Library. 403
Chomsky, N., 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Mass..
Chomsky, N., 1967, ‘The Formal Nature of Language’, in E. H. Lenneberg (ed.), Biological Foundations of Language, John Wiley, New York.
Chomsky, N., 1971, ‘Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation’, in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics, Cambridge University Press, London.
Chomsky, N., 1972, ‘Some Empirical Issues in the Theory of Transformational Grammar’ in S. Peters (ed.) Goals of Linguistic Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J..
Gregory, M., 1967, ‘Aspects of Varieties Differentiation’, Journal of Linguistics 3, 177–198.
Lieb, H.-H., 1968, Communication Complexes and Their Stages, Mouton, The Hague.
Lieb, H.-H., 1970, Sprachstudium und Sprachsystem, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.
Lieb, H.-H., 1974, ‘Grammars as Theories: The Case for Axiomatic Grammars (Part I)’, Theoretical Linguistics 1, 39–115.
Lewis, D., 1970, ‘General Semantics’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972, pp. 169–218.
Montague, R., 1970, R., 1970, ‘Universal Grammar’, Theoria 36, 373–398; see also Montague (1972).
Montague, R., 1972, ‘Universale Grammatik’, in R. Montague and H. Schnelle, Universale Grammatik, Vieweg, Braunschweig.
Schnelle, H., 1973, Sprachphilosophie und Linguistik, Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg.
Schnelle, H., 1974, ‘Review of Lieb (1970)’, Foundations of Language 11, 595–606.
Schnelle, H., 1975, ‘Montague’s Universal Syntax — A Comparative Study’, to appear.
Stegmüller, W., 1973, Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie, Vol. II, Zweiter Halbband, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schnelle, H. (1976). Basic Aspects of the Theory of Grammatical Form. In: Kasher, A. (eds) Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1876-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1876-0_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0645-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1876-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive