Skip to main content
  • 230 Accesses

Abstract

The twelfth Solvay Conference on Physics took place in Brussels from 9 to 14 October 1961. The general theme of the conference was ‘Quantum Field Theory’, and it would seem that this was the last time that this subject stood at the centre of a theoretical description of particle phenomena. In the following years the old quantum field theory would lose its dominant role in elementary particle theory, and return only much later in a largely modified form.

La Théorie Quantique des Champs, Rapports et Discussions du Douzième Conseil de Physique tenu à l’Université Libre de Bruxelles du 9 au 14 Octobre 1961, Interscience Publishers, New York, and R. Stoops, Brussels, 1962.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. D. Landau and R. E. Peierls, Z. Phys. 62, 188 (1930).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. L. D. Landau, Nucl. Phys. 13, 181 (1959).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, and W. Zimmermann, Nuovo Cim. 1, 1425 (1955);

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. S. Wightman, Phys. Rev. 101, 860 (1956).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. C. N. Yang and D. Feldman, Phys. Rev. 79, 972 (1950);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Källén, Ark. Fys. 2, 371 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For the programme of using dispersion and unitary relations as a basis for calculation in field theory, see, for example, M. Gell-Mann, Proc. of the Sixth Annual Rochester Conference (1956);

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. D. Landau, Proc. of the Kiev Conference (1959);

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. 115, 1741 (1959);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. F. Chew, Lectures at the Summer School of Theoretical Physics, Les Houches (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Castillejo, R. H. Dalitz, and F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 101, 453 (1956).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Tomonaga, Prog. Theor. Phys. 1, 27 (1926).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 74, 1439 (1948).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 76, 749, 769 (1949).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. W. E. Lamb and R. C. Retherford, Phys. Rev. 72, 241 (1947).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Schwinger and V. F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. 73, 1272 A (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 75, 486, 1736 (1949).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. C. Ward, Phys. Rev. 77, 293L (1950);

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. C. Ward, Phys. Rev. 78, 182L (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Hofstadter et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 6, 293 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. See, e.g., A. Peterman, Fortschr. Phys. 6, 505 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. 95, 1329 (1954);

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Pauli and G. Källén, Kgl. Danske Vid. Selsk. Mat-fys. Medd. 30, No. 7 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Landau’s contribution in Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics,Pergamon Press, London (1955), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. Heisenberg, Nucl. Phys. 4, 532 (1957).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. B. W. Sargent, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 28, 538 (1932);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. B. W. Sargent, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 139, 659 (1933).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 88, 161 (1934).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. G. Gamow and E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 49, 895 (1936).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Salam, Nuovo Cim. 5, No. 1, 299 (1957);

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. L. D. Landau, J. E. T. P. 32, 405 and 407 (1957);

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 104, 254 (1956)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 105, 1671 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. C. S. Wu, et al. Phys. Rev. 105, 1413 (1957).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. E. C. G. Sudarshan and R. E. Marshak, Padua-Venice Conference on Elementary Particles (157); Phys. Rev., 109, 193 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  36. O. Klein, Nature, 161, 897 (1948).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. G. Puppi, Nuovo Cim. 5, 587 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R. P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. 109, 193 (1958);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. J. J. Sakurai, Nuovo Cim. 7, 649 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. G. C. Wick, A. Wightman, and E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 88, 101 (1952).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. R. Sachs and S. Treiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. 109, 193 (1958).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. (Japan), 17, 48 (1935).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. B. Pontecorvo, JETP, 10, 1236 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  45. G. Danby, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 9, 36 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  46. W. I. Weissberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 1047 (1965);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 1051 (1965).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. E. Arnous, W. Heitler, and Y. Takahashi, Nuovo Cim. 16, 671 (1960);

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. E. Amous and W. Heitler, Nuovo Cim. 11, 443 (1959);

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. E. Arnous, et al., Nuovo Cim., 16, 785 (1960);

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. L. O’Raiferteigh, Heiv. Phys. Acta, 33, 783 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  52. H. Yukawa, Phys. Rev. 77, 219 (1950);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. H. Yukawa, Phys. Rev. 80, 1047 (1950);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. H. Yukawa, Phys. Rev. 91, 415 (1953);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. H. Yukawa, Science, 121, 405 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. D. Bohm, et al., Progr. Theor. Phys., 24, 761 (1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 74, 1439 (1948);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. W. Pauli and F. Villars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 434 (1949);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. E. C. G. Stiickelberg and D. Rivier, Phys. Rev. 74, 218, 986 (1948).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, W. Zimmermann, Nuovo Cim. 1, 1425 (1955);

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, W. Zimmermann, Nuovo Cim. 6, 319 (1957);

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. A. S. Wightman, Phys. Rev. 101, 860 (1956).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. L. Van Hove, Physica, 18, 145 (1952);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. K. O. Friedrich, Comm. Appl. Math. 5, 349 (1952);

    Google Scholar 

  65. K. O. Friedrich, Comm. Appl. Math 4, 161 (1951);

    Google Scholar 

  66. R. Haag, Dansk. Vid. Selsk., Mat., Fys. Medd., 29, No. 12 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  67. H. A. Kramers, Congresso Int. di Fisici, Como (1927), and R. Kronig, J. Opt. Soc. America, 12, 547 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  68. R. Kronig, Physica, 12, 543 (1946).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. M. Gell-Mann, M. Goldberger, and W. Thirring, Phys. Rev. 95, 1612 (1954);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. M. Gell-Mann, M. Goldberger, and W. Thirring, Phys. Rev. 97, 508 (1955).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. M. L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. 99, 979 (1955);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. M. L. Goldberger, H. Miyazawa and R. Oehme, Phys. Rev. 99, 986 (1955).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. G. F. Chew and F. Low, Phys. Rev. 113, 1640 (1959).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. G. F. Chew, M. L. Goldberger, F. E. Low, and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 106, 1337, 1345 (1957);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. K. Symanzik, Phys. Rev. 105, 743 (1957);

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. H. Bremmerman, et al., Phys. Rev., 109, 2178 (1958);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. N. N. Bogoliubov, Fortschr. Phys. 6, 169 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Ia. Pomeranchuk, Z. Exp. Teor, Fiz. 34 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  79. N. N. Bogoliubov, Fortschr. Phys. 6 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  80. W. R. Frazer and R. J. Fulco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 365 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mehra, J. (1975). Quantum Field Theory. In: The Solvay Conferences on Physics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1867-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1867-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1869-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1867-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics