Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series ((ASIC,volume 17))

Summary

Today simulation and Monte Carlo studies play an important and ever more significant role in virtually every field of human endeavor, and such studies often consume large amounts of computer time. Nearly every such study requires, for its execution, a source of random numbers (i.e. numbers which appear to be independent uniform random variables on the range 0.0 to 1.0). Historically statisticians have attempted to provide quality random numbers in quantity in various ways, the most common today being via numeric algorithms executed within a digital computer. Statistical testing can (although it has not yet) rank these algorithms on speed and goodness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashour, S. and Vaswani, S.D. (1972). Simulation, 18, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, C. B. and Zirkle, J. A. (1971). Analysis of random numbers from four random number generators. Technical Report 4–7, Technical Report, System Analysis Group, U. S. Army Combat Developments Command, Fort Belvior, Virginia 22060, August 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G.W. (1951). In Monte Carlo Method, A.S. Householder (ed.). National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 31 - 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, W.G. (1972). Interfaces, Bulletin of the Institute of Management Sciences, Meeting Issue,March 1972,121–22.(Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesser, R.J. (1972). A computer simulation model of conflict- cooperative behavior between social units. 42nd National Meeting of the Operations Research Society of America, Nov. 8–10, 1972, Atlantic City, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C.E. (1966). Random Numbers in Uniform and Normal Distribution with Indices for Subsets. Chandler Publishing Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C.E. and Holz, B.W. (1960). Exponentially Distributed Random Numbers. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Coveyou, R.R. and MacPherson, R.D. (1967). Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 14, 100–119.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz, E.J. (1975). Speed and quality of random numbers for simulation. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz, E.J. and Ramberg, J.S. (1975). Random Variable Generation, Digital Computers and Simulation. In Preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz, E.J., Ramberg, J.S. and Tadikamalla, P.R. (1974). Annual Technical Conference Transactions of the American Society for Quality Control, 28, 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration (1973). Prospectus “Adaptation of a freeway simulation model for studying incident detection and control”. RFP-72, Office of Research, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. and Yates, F. (1938). Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, G.E. (1951). In Monte Carlo Method, A.S. Householder (ed.). National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, R. (1943). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 38, 223–227.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J. (1969). The American Statistician, 23, 42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorenstein, S. (1967). Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 10, 111–118.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, M. (1961). Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 8, 163–167.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, M. (1965). Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 8, 177–179.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. (1873). The Messenger of Mathematics, 2, 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, P.C. (1951). In Monte Carlo Method, A.S. Householder (ed.). National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, J.M. and Handscomb, D.C. (1964). Monte Carlo Methods. Wiley, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, T.E. and Dobell, A.R. (1962). SIAM Review, 4, 230–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • IBM (1959; First Edition Reprinted December 1969 ). Random Number Generation and Testing. Reference Manual GC20-8011-0, International Business Machines Corporation, White Plains, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM (1970). System/360 scientific subroutine package, Version III, programmer’s manual, program number 360A-CM-03X, Manual GH20- 0205-4(Fifth Ed.), IBM Corporation, White Plains, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P.L. (1973). A generalized computer simulation of urban air pollution as related to energy use. 6th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 9–11, 1973, Honolulu, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M.G. and Babington-Smith, B. (1938). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 101, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M.G. and Babington-Smith, B. (1939). Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 6, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M.G. and Babington-Smith, B. (1951). Tables of Random Sampling Numbers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, D.E. (1969). The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, S.S. (1965). Numerical Methods and Computers. Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Learmonth, G.P. and Lewis, P.A.W. (1973). Proceedings of the Computer Science and Statistics Seventh Annual Symposium on the Interface, W.J. Kennedy (ed.). Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madalena, F.E. and Hill, W.G. (1972). Genetical Research, Cambridge, 20, 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manock, J.J. (1972). Simulation of chemical reactions with a digital computer. 24th Annual American Chemical Society Southeastern Regional Meeting, Nov. 2–4, 1972, Birmingham, Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsaglia, G., Ananthanarayanan, K. and Paul, N. (1973). How to use the McGill random number package “SUPER-DUPER”. School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, K. (1973). Japanese Psychological Research, 15, 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milstein, J.S. (1973). Dynamics of the Vietnam War, A Quantitative Analysis and Predictive Computer Simulation. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nance, R.E. and Overstreet, C.,Jr. (1972). Computing Reviews, 13, 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, T.H., Balintfy, J.L., Burdick, D.S. and Chu, K. (1966). Computer Simulation Techniques. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, H.R. (1973). Applied Statistics, 22, 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand Corporation (1955). A Million Random Digits with 100,000 Normal Deviates. The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rider, K.L. (1973). A simulation study of four proposed housing policies for New York City. Winter Simulation Conference, Jan. 17–19, 1973, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotenberg, A. (1960). Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 7, 75 - 77.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. (1974). Journal of Parapsychology, 38, 47 - 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichroew, D. and Lubin, J.F. (1966). Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 9, 723–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tippett, L.H.C. (1927). Random Sampling Numbers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocher, K.D. (1965). Operational Research Quarterly, 16, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, C.W. (1939). Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 6, 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. (1951). In Monte Carlo Method, A.S. Householder (ed.). National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Zeppelin, I. and Moser, U. (1973). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 54, 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1916). Mathematische Annalen, 77, 313–52.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G.U. (1938). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 101, 167–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dudewicz, E.J. (1975). Random Numbers: The Need, the History, the Generators. In: Patil, G.P., Kotz, S., Ord, J.K. (eds) A Modern Course on Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1845-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1845-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1847-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1845-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics