Skip to main content

Species Concepts and Definitions

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 27))

Abstract

The importance of one fact of nature is being recognized to an ever increasing extent: that the living world is comprised of more or less distinct entities which we call species. Why are species so important? Not just because they exist in huge numbers, and because each species, when properly studied, turns out to be different from every other, morphologically and in many other respects. Species are important because they represent an important level of integration in living nature. This recognition is fundamental to pure biology, no less than to all subdivisions of applied biology. An inventory of the species of animals and plants of the world is the base line of further research in biology. Whether he realizes it or not, every biologist — even he who works on the molecular level — works with species or parts of species and his findings may be influenced decisively by the choice of a particular species. The communication of his results will depend on the correct identification of the species involved, and thus, on its taxonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arkell, W. J.: 1956, ‘The Species Concept in Paleontology’, Systematics Assoc. Publ. No. 2, pp. 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, H.: 1905, ‘Der Speziesbegriff’, Verhandl. Schweiz, naturforsch. Ges. 87, 161–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, K. E. von: 1828, Entwickelungs-Geschichte der Thiere, Königsberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besnard, A. F.: 1864, ‘Altes und Neues zur Lehre über die organische Art (Spezies), Abhandl. zool. mineral. Ver. Regensburg 9, 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessey, C. E.: 1908, ‘The Taxonomic Aspect of the Species Question’, Am. Naturalist 42, 218–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, F.: 1885, ‘Systematisch-zoologische Studien’, Sitzber. Akad. Wiss. Wien 91 (Abt. 1), 237–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, N. L.: 1908, The Taxonomic Aspect of the Species Question’, Am. Naturalist, 42, 225–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burma, B. H.: 1949a, ‘The Species Concept: A Semantic Review’, Evolution 3, 369–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burma, B. H.: 1949b, ‘The Species Concept: Postscriptum’, Evolution 3, 372–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burma, B. H.: 1954, ‘Reality, Existence, and Classification: A Discussion of the Species Problem’, Madroño 7, 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, A. J.: 1953, ‘Geography, Ecology and Coexistence in Relation to the Biological Definition of the Species’, Evolution 7, 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp, W. H. and Gillis, C. L.: 1943, ‘The Structure and Origin of Species’, Brittonia 4, 323–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1935, ‘A Critique of the Species Concept in Biology’, Phil. Sci. 2, 344–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1950, ‘Mendelian Populations and Their Evolution’, Am. Naturalist 84, 401–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doederlein, L.: 1902, ‘über die Beziehungen nahe verwandter “Thierformen” zu einander’, Z. Morphol. Anthropol. 26, 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, E. C.: 1955, ‘Comparative Evolution and the Origin of Sexuality’, Systematic Zool. 4, 145–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Rietz, G. E.: 1930, ‘The Fundamental Units of Botanical Taxonomy’, Svensk. Bot. Tidsskr. 24, 333–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, G. H. T.: 1889, Artbildung und Verwandtschaft bei Schmetterlingen, Jena, Vol. II, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy Saint Hilaire, I.: 1859, Histoire naturelle générale des règnes organiques 2, 437, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, I.: 1938, ‘Arithmetical Definition of the Species, Subspecies and Race Concept, with a Proposal for a Modified Nomenclature’, Zoologica 23, 253–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloger, C. L.: 1833, Das Abändern der Vögel durch Einfluss des Klimas, Breslau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloger, C. L.: 1856, ‘Ueber den Begriff von “Art” (”Species”) und was in dieselbe hinein gehört’, J. Ornithol. 4, 260–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godron, D. A.: 1853, De l’espèce et des races dansles êtres organisés et spécialement de l’unité de l’espèce humaine, Paris, 2vols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, E. L.: 1912, ‘Linnaeus as an Evolutionist’, in Carolus Linnaeus, pp. 73–91, C. Sower & Co., Philadelphia, Pa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, J. R.: 1950, ‘Taxonomy, Language and Reality’, Am. Naturalist 84, 419–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J.: 1942, Evolution, the Modern Synthesis, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uliger, J. C. W.: 1800, Versuch einer systematischen vollständigen Terminologie für das Thierreich und Pflanzenreich, Helmstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K.: 1896, ‘On Mechanical Selection and Other Problems’, Novit. Zool. 3 426–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K.: 1905, ‘Der Gegensatz zwischen geographischer und nichtgeographischer Variation’, Z. wiss. Zool. 83, 151–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, E.: 1948, ‘Der Artbegriff in der Paläontologie’, Eclogae Geolog. Helv. 41, 389–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorkovicz, Z.: 1953, ‘Spezifische, semispezifische und rassische Differenzierung bei Erebia tyndarus Esp.’ Rad. Acad. Yougoslave 294, 315–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1940, ‘Speciation Phenomena in Birds’, Am. Naturalist 74, 249–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1942, Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1949, ‘The Species Concept: Semantics versus Semantics’, Evolution 3, 371–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1951, ‘Concepts of Classification and Nomenclature in Higher Organisms and Microorganisms’, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 56, 391–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1955, ‘Karl Jordan’s Contribution to Current Concepts in Systematics and Evolution’, Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London, 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1956, ‘Geographical Character Gradients and Climatic Adaptation’ Evolution 10, 105–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. and Rosen, C.: 1956, ‘Geographic Variation and Hybridization in Populations of Bahama Snails (Cerion)9, Am. Museum Novit. 1806, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., Linsley, E. G., and Usinger, R. L.: 1953, Methods and Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglitsch, P. A.: 1954, ‘On the Nature of the Species’, Systematic Zool. 3, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niggli, P.: 1949, Probleme der Naturwissenschaften (Der Begriff der Art in der Mineralogie), Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plate, L.: 1914, ‘Prinzipien der Systematik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Systems der Tiere’, in Die Kultur der Gegenwart, III (iv, 4), pp. 92–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. B.: 1903, ‘What is a Species?’, Proc. Entomol. Soc. London for 1903, Ixxvii–cxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quatrefages, A. de: 1892, Darwin et les précurseurs français, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbottom, J.: 1938, ‘Linnaeus and the Species Concept’, Proc. Linnean Soc. London (150 session), 192–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J.: 1686, Historia Plantarum, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch, B.: 1929, Das Prinzip geographischer Rassenkreise und das Problem der Artbildung, Bornträger Verl., Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, A.: 1851, Parerga und Paralipomena: kleine philosophische Schriften, Vol. 2, pp. 121–22, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G.: 1943, ‘Criteria for Genera, Species, and Subspecies in Zoology and Paleozoology’, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 44, 145–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G.: 1951, ‘The Species Concept’, Evolution 5, 285–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirks, M. J.: 1952, ‘Variability in the Concept of Species’, Acta Biotheoretica 10, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, A. F.: 1838, lieber die naturhistorischen Begriffe von Gattung, Art und Abart und über die Ursachen der Abartungen in den organischen Reichen, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurway, H.: 1955, ‘The Sub-Human Capacities for Species Recognition and Their Correlation with Reproductive Isolation’, Acta XI Congr. Intern. Orn., Basel, 1954, pp. 340–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann, E.: 1919, ‘über die europäischen Baumläufer’, Verhandl. Orn. Ges. Bayern 14, 39–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester-Bradley, P. C.: 1956, The Species Concept in Paleontology. Introduction’, Systematics Assoc. Publ., No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G.: 1956, ‘The Species Concept in Paleontology’, Systematics Assoc. Publ. No. 2, pp. 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann, E.: 1923, ‘Entwicklungsgedanke und Artbegriff in ihrer geschichtlichen Entstehung und sachlichen Beziehung’, Jena. Z. Naturw. 59, 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, D. H.: 1949, ‘The Units of Experimental Taxonomy’, Acta Biotheoretica 9, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, F. S.: 1817, Grundzüge einer Naturgeschichte als Geschichte der Entstehung und weiteren Ausbildung der Naturkörper, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. R.: 1889, Darwinism: An Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection, with Some of Its Applications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yapp, W. B.: 1951, ‘Definitions in Biology’, Nature 167, 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayr, E. (1976). Species Concepts and Definitions. In: Topics in the Philosophy of Biology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1829-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1829-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0596-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics