Skip to main content

The Current Interest in Orthomodular Lattices

  • Chapter
The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 5a))

Abstract

All published work on orthomodular lattice theory has appeared within the last fifteen years; no more than thirty people have ever worked on it; no more than fifty papers dealing explicitly with it have ever appeared: Orthomodular lattice theory is therefore a newly uncovered very small corner of mathematics.

Reprinted from Trends in Lattice Theory (ed. by J. C. Abbott), Van Nostrand Reinhold Math. Studies #31, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1970.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Part 1. Works Referenced in the Text

  1. Amemiya, I. and Halperin, I., ‘Complemented Modular Lattices’, Canad. J. Math. 11 (1950), 481–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amemiya, I. and Araki, H., ‘A Remark on Piron’s Paper’, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. Ser. A, 12 (1966/67), 423–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Birkhoff, G., ‘Lattices in Applied Mathematics’, from Lattice Theory, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. Vol. 11, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Birkhoff, G., Lattice Theory, 3rd ed., Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. Vol. 25 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Birkhoff, G. and Neumann, J. von, ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Ann. of Math. 37 (1936), 823–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bodiou, G., Théorie dialectique des probabilités, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dilworth, R. P., ‘On Complemented Lattices’, Tohoku Math. J. 47 (1940), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dixmier, J., ‘Position relative de deux variétés linéaires fermées dans un espace de Hilbert’, La Revue Scientifique, Fasc. 7, 86 (1948), 387–399.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dixmier, J., Les algèbres d’opérateurs dans l’espace hilbertien, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dye, H. A., ‘On the Geometry of Projections in Certain Operator Algebras’, Ann. of Math. 61 (1955), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fillmore, P. A., ‘Perspectivity in Projection lattices’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1965), 383–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Foulis, D. J., ‘Baer *-Semigroups’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 11 (1960), 648–654.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foulis, D. J., ‘A Note on Orthomodular Lattices’, Portugal. Math. 21 (1962), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foulis, D. J., ‘Notes on Orthomodular Lattices’, lecture notes, Univ. of Florida, 1963 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foulis, D. J., ‘Lattices and Semigroups’, mimeographed, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gardner, L. T., ‘On Isomorphisms of C*-Algebras’, Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 384–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gleason, A. M., ‘Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space’, J. Math. Mech. 6 (1957), 885–894.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Greechie, R. J., ‘On the Structure of Orthomodular Lattices Satisfying the Chain Condition’, (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gudder, S. P., ‘Spectral Methods for a Generalized Probability Theory’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 119 (1965), 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Halmos, P. R., Introduction to Hilbert Space and the Theory of Spectral Multiplicity, Chelsea, New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halperin, I., ‘Complemented Modular Lattices’, from Lattice Theory, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. Vol. II, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holland, Jr., S. S., ‘A Radon-Nikodym Theorem in Dimension Lattices’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1963), 66–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Holland, Jr., S. S., ‘Distributivity and Perspectivity in Orthomodular Lattices’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 112 (1964), 330–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Janowitz, M. F., ‘A Semigroup Approach to Lattices’, Canad. J. Math. 18 (1966), 1212–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Janowitz, M. F., ‘Notes on Orthomodular Lattices’, Univ. of New Mexico, 1965 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Janowitz, M. F., ‘On Conditionally Continuous Lattices’, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report no. 107 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplansky, I., ‘Any Orthocomplemented Complete Modular Lattice is a Continuous Geometry’, Ann. of Math. 61 (1955), 524–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplansky, I., ‘Rings of Operators’, University of Chicago Mimeographed Notes, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Loomis, L. H., ‘The Lattice Theoretic Background of the Dimension Theory of Operator Algebras’, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 18 (1955), 36 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ludwig, G., ‘Versuch einer axiomatischen Grundlegung der Quantenmechanik und allgemeiner physikalischer Theorien’, Z. Physik 181 (1964), 233–260 (mimeographed English translation available).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mackey, G. W., ‘On Infinite-Dimensional Linear Spaces’, Transl. Amer. Math., Soc. 57 (1945), 155–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mackey, G. W., Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mac Laren, M. D., ‘Nearly Modular Orthocomplemented Lattices’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1965), 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mac Laren, M. D., ‘Notes on Axioms for Quantum Mechanics’, Argonne National Lab. Rept. ANL-7065, July 1965 (available from the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia, $ 1.00).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maeda, F., ‘Relative Dimensionality in Operator Rings’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 11 (1941), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maeda, F., Kontinuierliche geometrien, Springer, Berlin, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Maeda, F. and Maeda, S., Theory of Symmetric Lattices, book in press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maeda, S., ‘Dimension Functions on Certain General Lattices’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A-1 Math. 19 (1955), 211–237.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maeda, S., ‘On Conditions for the Orthomodularity’, Proc. Japan Acad. 42 (1966), 247–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Murray, F. J. and Neumann, J. von, ‘On Rings of Operators’, Ann. of Math. 37 (1936), 116–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nakamura, M., ‘The Permutability in a Certain Orthocomplemented Lattice’, Kodai Math. Series. Rep. 9 (1957), 158–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Neumann, J. von, ‘Continuous Geometry’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 22 (1936), 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Neumann, J. von, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Neumann, J. von, Continuous Geometry, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ramsay, A., ‘Dimension Theory in Complete Orthocomplemented Weakly Modular Lattices’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 116 (1965), 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Randall, C. H., ‘A Mathematical Foundation for Empirical Science — with Special Reference to Quantum Theory. Part 1, A Calculus of Experimental Propositions’, Knolls Atomic Power Lab. Report. KAPL-3147. June 1966. Available from the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield. Virginia, $6.00.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Segal, I. E., ‘A Non-Commutative Extension of Abstract Integration’, Ann. of Math. (2) 57 (1953), 401–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Simmons, G. F., Topology and Modern Analysis, McGraw-Hill, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stone, M. H., ‘Linear Transformations in Hilbert Space’, Amer. Math. Soc., Colloq. Publ. Vol. 15, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Topping, D. M., ‘Asymptoticity and Semimodularity in Projection Lattices’, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Varadarajan, V. S., ‘Probability in Physics and a Theorem on Simultaneous Observability’, Comm. Pure and Appl. Math. 15, (1962), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zierler, N. ‘Axioms for Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics’, Pacific J. Math. 11 (1961), 1151–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zierler, N., ‘On the Lattice of Closed Subspaces of Hilbert Space’, Pacific J. Math. 19 (1966), 583–586.

    Google Scholar 

Part 2. Works Not Referenced in the Text

  • Berberian, S. K., ‘On the Projection Geometry of a Finite AW*-Algebra’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1956), 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodiou, G., ‘Probabilité sur une trellis non modulair’, Publ. Inst. Statist., Univ. Paris 6 (1957), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodiou, G., Recherches sur les fondements du calcul quantique des probabilité dans les cas purs, Masson, Paris, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croisot, R., ‘Applications Residuées’, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 73 (1956), 453–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, R. P., ‘The Structure of Relatively Complemented Lattices’, Ann. of Math. 51 (1950), 348–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C., ‘Separation of Two Linear Subspaces’, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 19 (1958), 172–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, H. A., ‘The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for Finite Rings of Operators’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1952), 243–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulis, D. J., ‘Conditions for the Modularity of an Orthomodular Lattice’, Pacific J. Math. 11 (1961), 889–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulis, D. J., ‘Relative Inverses in Baer *-Semigroups’, Mich. Math. J. 10 (1963), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulis, D. J., ‘Semigroups Coordinatizing Orthomodular Geometries’, Canad. J. Math. 17 (1960), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratzer, G. and Schmidt, E. T., ‘Ideals and Congruence Relations in Lattices’, Acta. Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar 9 (1958), 137–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratzer, G. and Schmidt, E. T., ‘Standard Ideals in Lattices’, Acta. Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar 12 (1961), 17–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halmos, P. R., Algebraic Logic, Chelsea, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, I., ‘Introduction to von Neumann Algebras and Continuous Geometry’, Canad. Math. Bull. 3 (1960), 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbalunnisa, ‘Neutrality in Weakly Modular Lattices’, Acta. Math. Acad. Sci. Hunger. 26 (1965), 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbalunnisa, ‘On Neutral Elements in a Lattice’, J. Indian Math. Soc. (New series) 28 (1964), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘Quasi-Orthomodular Lattices’, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report No. 42 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘AC-Lattices’, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report No. 45 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘Quantifiers and Orthomodular Lattices’, Pacific J. Math. 13 (1963), 1241–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘On the Antitone Mappings of a Poset’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (1964), 529–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘Projective Ideals and Congruence Relations’, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report No. 51 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘Projective Ideals and Congruence Relations IF, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report No. 63 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘Residuated Closure Operators’, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report No. 79 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘A Note on Normal Ideals’, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report No. 95 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘A Characterization of Standard Ideals’, Acta. Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar 26 (1965), 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘Quantifier Theory on Quasi-Orthomodular Lattices’, Illinois J. Math. 9 (1965), 660–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘Baer-Semigroups’, Duke Math. J. 32 (1965), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘Independent Complements in Lattices’, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report No. 87 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. F., ‘The Center of a Complete Relatively Complemented Lattice is a Complete Sublattice’, Univ. of New Mexico Tech. Report No. 105 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplansky, I., ‘Projections in Banach Algebras’, Ann. of Math. 53 (1951), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Laren, M. D., ‘Atomic Orthocomplemented Lattices’, Pacific J. Math. 14 (1964), 597–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, F., ‘Direct Sums and Normal Ideals of Lattices’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A-I Math. 14 (1949), 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, F., ‘Representations of Orthocomplemented Lattices’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 14 (1950), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, F., ‘Decomposition of General Lattices into direct Summands of Types I, II and III’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 23 (1959), 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, S., ‘On the Lattices of Projections of a Baer *-Ring’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 22 (1958), 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, S., ‘On Relatively Semi-Orthocomplemented Lattices’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 24 (1960), 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, S., ‘On a Ring whose Principal Right Ideals Generated by Idempotents Form a Lattice’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 24 (1960), 510–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, S., ‘Dimension Theory on Relatively Semi-Orthocomplemented Complete Lattices’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 25 (1961), 369–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, S., ‘On the Symmetry of the Modular Relation in Atomic Lattices’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A-I 29 (1965), 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgado, J., ‘On the Automorphisms of the Lattice of Closure Operators of a Complete Lattice’, Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina 20 (1960), 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgado, J., ‘Some Results on Closure Operators of Partially Ordered Sets’, Portugal Math. 19 (1960), 101–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgado, J., ‘Note on the Automorphisms of the Lattice of Closure Operators of a Complete Lattice’, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 64 (1961), 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgado, J., ‘Some Remarks on Quasi-Isomorphisms between Finite Lattices’, Portugal Math. 20 (1961), 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgado, J., ‘Quasi-Isomorphisms between Complete Lattices’, Portugal Math. 20 (1961), 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, N., ‘Center of Closure Operators and a Decomposition of a Lattice’, Math. Japan 4 (1964), 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. von, Collected Works, 6 vols., Pergamon, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, D., ‘Partition and Modulated Lattices’, Pacific J. Math. 11 (1961), 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, U., ‘On an Axiom of Continuous Geometry’, J.’ Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A (1950), 100–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, U., ‘On Orthocomplemented Lattices Satisfying the Exchange Axiom’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 17 (1954), 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, U., ‘Lattices of Projections in AW*-Algebra’, J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A 19 (1955), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, E. T., ‘Remark on a Paper of M. F. Janowitz’, Acta. Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 16 (1965), 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, E. A., ‘Modular Pairs in Orthomodular Lattices’, Pacific J. Math. 19 (1966), 519–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, D. M., ‘Jordan Algebra of Self-Adjoint Operators’, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 53 (1965), 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, F. B., ‘A Reduction for Algebras of Finite Type’, Ann. of Math. 60 (1954), 560–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, F. B., ‘Some Remarks on Boolean Duality’, Portugal Math. 16 (1957), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zierler, N. and Schlessinger, M., ‘Boolean Embeddings of Orthomodular Sets and Quantum Logic’, Duke Math. J. 32 (1965), 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Part 3. Some Recent Papers on Quantum Mechanics Not Listed in [34] or [46]

  • Jordan, P., ‘Quantenlogik und das kommutative Gesatz’, from The Axiomatic Method (ed. by L. Henkin, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski, Amsterdam 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, G., ‘An Axiomatic Foundation of Quantum Mechanics on a Non-Subjective Basis’, Marburg/L. Mimeographed, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, G., ‘Attempt of an Axiomatic Foundation of Quantum Mechanics and More General Physical Theories II’, mimeographed, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G., ‘Zur Orthomodularität von Wahrscheinlichkeitsfeldern’, Z. Physik 181 (1964), 331–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizsacker, C. G. von, ‘Komplementarität und Logik I’, Naturwissenschaften 42 (1955), 521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizsacker, C. G. von, ‘Komplementarität und Logik II’, Z. Naturforsch. 13a (1958), 245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsacker, C. G. von, ‘Komplementarität und Logik III’, Z. Naturforsch. 13a (1958), 705.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holland, S.S. (1975). The Current Interest in Orthomodular Lattices. In: Hooker, C.A. (eds) The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 5a. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1795-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1795-4_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0613-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1795-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics