Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 4))

Abstract

The following dialogue is drawn from Plato’s Cratylus.

This paper derives from an earlier version entitled ‘Buridan and Two-Dimensional Model Theory’ delivered at Waterloo University in the Summer of 1969. Another version was given at Livingston College, Rutgers University in December 1971. My understanding of Buridan has been greatly helped by many discussions with Calvin Normore and Paul Spade. Recently John Martin has worked out some further developments in two-dimensional semantics, and I have benefitted from discussing this work with him.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In N. Hanson’s sense of ‘conceptual possibility’ described in his Patterns of Discovery (P. 84).

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Buridan: Sophisms on Meaning and Truth, T. K. Scott, ed. (p. 83)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nyaya Philosophy, trans. by D. Chattopadhyaya and M. Gangopadhyaya, Indian Studies Publication, Calcutta, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Gamma, 1011b27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. W. Leibniz, General Inquiries About the Analysis of Concepts and of Truths, §1 (1686). Reprinted in G. H. R. Parkinson, Leibniz: Logical Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Tarski, ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth’, §18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buridan, Sophisms (p. 181).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buridan, Sophisms (p. 183).

    Google Scholar 

  9. On the first claim, see J. Ashworth, The Theory of Consequence in the Late Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (1973), 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. On the second claim see for example, B. Mates, ‘Leibniz on Possible Worlds’ in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III, 1968, B. van Rootselaar and F. Staal, eds.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buridan, Sophisms (p. 92).

    Google Scholar 

  12. And possibly inconsistencies as well. See P. Spade, The Mediaeval Liar, Ph. D. dissertation, Toronto 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buridan, Sophisms (p. 92).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus §4. 463.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buridan, Sophisms (p. 182). This doctrine was noted in E. Moody, Truth and Consequence in Mediaeval Logic, 1953, and has been discussed by others, notably A. Prior in ‘The Possibly-True and the Possible’, Mind 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buridan, Sophisms (p. 183).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Jaskowski, ‘Investigations into the System of Intuitionist Logic’ 1936, reprinted in S. McCall, Polish Logic. A brief survey of product-logics can be found in Ch. 2 §16 of N. Rescher’s Many-Valued Logic. Łukasiewicz advocated a particular four-valued product logic in his ‘A System of Modal Logic’, 1953, reprinted in Jan Łukasiewicz: Selected Works, L. Borkowski, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Other product logics in four values are given in A. Church, ‘Non-Normal Truth-Tables for the Propositional Calculus’, Boletin de la Sociedad Matematica Mexicana, 1953, and in A. Church, Introduction to Mathematical Logic v. 1, exercise §19.9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Bas van Fraassen, ‘Presupposition, Implication, and Self-Reference’ Journal of Philosophy, 1968, and references cited therein.

    Google Scholar 

  20. It is not uncommon to find the Fregean principle taken as an initial working hypothesis from which departures and exceptions are assessed. Cf. Laurence Horn, On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, Ph. D. dissertation, UCLA 1973; and also the work of Lauri Karttunen.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Some historical remarks on this idea can be found in my paper, ‘Truth and Modality in Semantically Closed Languages’, in The Paradox of The Liar, Robert L. Martin, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Bas van Fraassen, Formal Semantics and Logic, Ch. III §6, Ch. V §3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

D. Hockney W. Harper B. Freed

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herzberger, H.G. (1975). Dimensions of Truth. In: Hockney, D., Harper, W., Freed, B. (eds) Contemporary Research in Philosophical Logic and Linguistic Semantics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1756-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1756-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0512-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1756-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics