Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Historical Library ((SYHL,volume 15))

  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

The date and manner of the first discovery of incommensurability have not been preserved for us by any credible witness. Three authors, seven hundred years after the fact, offer us some information of the origins of the theory of incommensurability, but it is difficult to judge how much, if any, historical validity this information has.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Pappus, Commentary…on Book X of Euclid’s Elements, ed. G. Junge and W. Thomson, 1930, pp. 63, 64. The same story is told in a Greek scholium to the Tenth Book; cf. Euclid, Elementa, ed, J. L. Heiberg, V, p. 417. Here the terms for “irrational” are bXoyov and dveiSeov. This scholium may derive from Proclus; cf. J. H. Knoche, Scholien des Proklus Diadochus zu Euklids Elementen 1865, pp. 17 - 28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Proclus, In Primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum, ed. G. Friedlein, 1873, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. L. Heath, HGM 1921, 1, p. 154. The abbreviated version of the Eudemean summary appears in Hero, Definitiones, etc. (Opera, ed. J. L. Heiberg, IV, p. 108 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. L. Heiberg, ‘Mathematisches zu Aristoteles’, AbhGMW 1904, 18, p. 24; also H. Vogt, ‘Entdeckungsgeschichte’, BM 1909–10, pp. 148–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. Becker, in Das mathematische Denken der Antike, 1957, p. 51, has offered a similar argument for showing the impossibility of solving the relation A2=2B2 in integers, via the pebble-arithmetic of the Pythagoreans.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.Diels, FV 1951, 29A25, I, p. 253. The Achilles-paradox (ibid., A26) involves similar principles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knorr, W.R. (1975). The Side and the Diameter. In: The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements. Synthese Historical Library, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1754-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1754-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1192-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1754-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics