Abstract
One of the most common and most fundamental criticisms of phenomenology has always been: What can a science of mere phenomena tell about reality itself? It may tell us what we take to be real. But does this in any way guarantee that the supposedly real is actually real? How can phenomenology decide the truth of what we mean? Is not this the end and a rather quick end of every phenomenology?
To the memory of Kurt Huber, my teacher at the University of Munich. Martyr of the German Resistance to Nazism, and redeemer of the tradition of my alma mater, who started me on the problem of this study.
“The ‘Reality-Phenomenon’ and Reality,” in Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl, ed. By Marvin Farber (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1940), 99 84–105; and “Critical Phenomenological Realism,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1 (1941), pp. 154–76.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spiegelberg, H. (1975). The Phenomenon of Reality and Reality. In: Doing Phenomenology. Phaenomenologica, vol 63. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1670-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1670-4_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1672-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1670-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive