Abstract
We begin by considering the paradoxical axiom, which is the most widely accepted, by the profession and others, that the paranoic is in need of help though he suffers from an intellectual quirk. We can present the paradox of paranoia at once as the very well-known fact that we may observe two people with similar or seemingly similar intellectual structures (or thought-patterns, or practical logic, or what have you), one fairly independent and the other in dire need of help. Or we can present the paradox of paranoia at once as the very well-known fact that a paranoic needs help even though he may be, and often is, more intelligent, more perceptive, and more self-aware, than an average normal member of the community who can manage much more independently.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fried, Y., Agassi, J. (1976). The Paradoxes of Paranoia Revisited. In: Paranoia: A Study in Diagnosis. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1506-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1506-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0705-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1506-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive