Skip to main content

The erkenntnistheoretikers Dilemma: J. B. Stallo’s Attack on Atomism in His Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics (1881)

  • Chapter
PSA 1974

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 32))

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

Notable among the by-products of the late nineteenth-century controversies over the atomic theory of matter was the first full-scale contribution to the philosophy of science written in America,. John Bernard Stallo’s The Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics. The work of a lawyer and jurist largely self-trained in philosophy, its publication in 1881 provoked considerable (and mostly hostile) reaction1, for Stallo attacked atomism and mechanism at a time when scientists were still divided into vociferously opposing camps over the question of whether or not the ultimate structure of matter was atomic - indeed, were in sharp disagreement over even the utility of the hypothetical concept ’atom’ in physics and chemistry.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Adams, H.: 1946, The Education of Henry Adams, Modern Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. W.: 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. W.: 1960, ‘Introduction’, CT, pp. vii–xxix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. H., and D. Knight: 1967, ‘The Atomic Debates’, in W. H. Brock (ed.), The Atomic Debates: Brodie and the Rejection of the Atomic Theory. Three Studies, Leicester University Press, Leicester, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchdahl, G.: 1959, ‘Sources of Scepticism in Atomic Theory’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 10, 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cournot, A.-A.: 1861, Traité de l’Enchaînement des Idées Fondamentales dans les Sciences et dans l’Histoire, L. Hachette, Paris, I, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S.: 1959, ‘J. B. Stallo and the Critique of Classical Physics’, in H. M. Evans (ed.), Men and Moments in the History of Science, University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp. 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S.: 1967, ‘Stallo, John Bernard’, in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan and the Free Press, New York, 8, pp. 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, L.: 1966, Hegel’s First American Followers. The Ohio Hegelians: John B. Stallo, Peter Kaufmann, Moncure Conway, and August Willich, with Key Writings, Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinpeter, H.: 1901, ‘J. B. Stallo als Erkenntniskritiker’, Vierteljahrsschrift für wiss. Phil. 25, 401–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinpeter, H.: 1913, Der Phänomenalismus: Eine naturwissenschaftliche Weltanschauung, J. Barth, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D. M. (ed.): 1968, Classical Scientific Papers: Chemistry, American Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E.: 1901, ‘Vorwart’ to J. B. Stallo, Die Begriffe und Theorien der modernen Physik, J. Barth, Leipzig, pp. III–XIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. C.: 1965, Scientific Papers, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, É.: 1962, Identity and Reality, Dover, New York. (Original French edition 1907.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, L: 1952, Opticks, Dover, New York. (Based on the 4th edition, London, 1730.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattermann, H. A.: 1902, Johann Bernhard Stallo, Deutsch-amerikanischer Philosoph, Jurist und Staatsmann, Verlag des Verfassers, Cincinnati, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, J.: 1946, ‘Introduction’ (1913) to H. Poincaré, The Foundations of Science, The Science Press, Lancaster, Pa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1956, An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry, Dover, New York. (Original edition 1897).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, P. G.: 1882, ‘Modern Physics’, Nature 26, 521–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, J.: 1969, ‘Karl Pearson, Ernst Mach, J. B. Stallo’, Isis 60, 535–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W.: 1847, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 2nd ed., John Parker, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, E.: 1960, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Volume Two: The Modern Theories 1900–1926, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. D.: 1951, ‘John B. Stallo’s Criticism of Physical Science’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strong, J.V. (1976). The erkenntnistheoretikers Dilemma: J. B. Stallo’s Attack on Atomism in His Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics (1881). In: Cohen, R.S., Hooker, C.A., Michalos, A.C., Van Evra, J.W. (eds) PSA 1974. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1449-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1449-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0648-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1449-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics