Abstract
Galileo has been seen, from the philosophical point of view, alternately as a Platonist whose rationalist insights enabled him to read the book of nature because it was written in ‘the language of mathematics,’ and as an experimentalist who used the hypothetico-deductive methods of modern science to establish his new results empirically (McTighe, 1967; Settle, 1967; Drake, 1970; Shapere, 1974). Both of these views present difficulties. In this paper I shall make use of recent historical research to argue that neither is correct, that the method utilized by Galileo was neither Platonist nor hypothetico-deductivist, but was basically Aristotelian and Archimedean in character. This method, moreover, was not merely that of classical antiquity, but it had been emended and rejuvenated in the sixteenth century, and then not by Greek humanist Aristotelians or by Latin Averroists but rather by scholastic authors of the Collegio Romano whose own inspiration derived mainly from Thomas Aquinas. Other influences, of course, were present, and these came from other medieval and Renaissance writers, but these need not concern us in what follows.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Blake, R. M, Ducasse, C. J., and Madden, E. H.: 1960, Theories of Scientific Method: The Renaissance through the Nineteenth Century, Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle.
Crombie, A. C: 1975, ‘The Sources of Galileo’s Early Natural Philosophy’, in M. L. Righini Bonelli and W. R. Shea (eds.), Reason, Experiment, and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution, Science History Publications, New York, 1975, pp. 157–175, 303-305.
Drake, S.: 1970, Galileo Studies: Personality, Tradition, and Revolution, Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Drake, S.: 1973a, ‘Galileo’s Discovery of the Law of Free Fall,’ Scientific American 228, pp. 84–92.
Drake, S.: 1973b, ‘Galileo’s Experimental Confirmation of Horizontal Inertia: Unpublished Manuscripts’, (Galileo Gleanings XXII), Isis 64, pp. 290–305.
Drake, S. (ed.): 1974, Galileo Galilei: Two New Sciences, including Centers of Gravity and Force of Percussion, translated with introduction and notes, Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
Duhem, P.: 1913, Etudes sur Léonard de Vinci,Vol. 3, A. Hermann et Fils, Paris.
Duhem, P.: 1969, To Save the Phenomena. An Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory from Plato to Galileo, tr. E. Doland and C. Maschler, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Favaro, A. (ed.): 1890–1909, Le Opère di Galileo Galilei, 20 vols, in 21, G. Barbèra, Florence, reprinted 1968.
Finnochiaro, M. A.: 1972, ‘Vires acquirit eundo: The Passage Where Galileo Renounces Space-Acceleration and Causal Investigation’, Physis 14, 125–145.
Fredette, R.: 1972, ‘Galileo’s De motu antiquiora\ Physis 14, 321–348.
Harré, R.: 1972, The Philosophies of Science. An Introductory Survey. Oxford Univ. Press, London, Oxford and New York.
Koertge, N.: 1974, ‘Galileo and the Problem of Accidents’, paper read to the British Society for the Philosophy of Science, October 7, 1974, being readied for publication.
Koyré, A.: 1939, Etudes Galiléenes, Hermann, Paris, reprinted 1966.
Koyré, A.: 1968, Metaphysics and Measurement. Essays in Scientific Revolution, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Koyré, A. and Cohen, I. B.: 1972, Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathe-matica, 3d ed. of 1726 with variant readings, 2 vols., Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
MacLachlan, J.: 1973, ‘A Test of an “Imaginary” Experiment of Galileo’s,’ Isis 64, 374–379.
McTighe, T. P.: 1967, ‘Galileo’s “Platonism”: A Reconsideration’, in E. McMullin (ed.), Galileo, Man of Science, Basic Books, Inc., New York and London, 1967, pp. 365–387.
Naylor, R. H.: 1974, ‘Galileo and the Problem of Free Fall’, The British Journal for the History of Science 7, 105–134.
Purnell, F.: 1972, ‘Jacopo Mazzoni and Galileo’, Physis 14, 273–294.
Schmitt, C. B.: 1972, ‘The Faculty of Arts at Pisa at the Time of Galileo’, Physis 14, 243–272.
Settle, T. B.: 1961, ‘An Experiment in the History of Science’, Science 133, 19–23.
Settle, T. B.: 1967, ‘Galileo’s Use of Experiment as a Tool of Investigation’, in E. McMullin (ed.), Galileo, Man of Science, Basic Books, Inc., New York and London, 1967, pp. 315–337.
Shapere, D.: 1974, Galileo: A Philosophical Study, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Shea, W. R.: 1972, Galileo’s Intellectual Revolution. Middle Period 1610–1632, Science History Publications, New York.
Shea, W. R. and Wolf, N. S.: 1975, ‘Stillman Drake and the Archimedean Grandfather of Experimental Science’, to appear in Isis.
Wallace, W. A.: 1959, The Scientific Methodology of Theodoric of Freiberg, Fribourg Univ. Press, Fribourg.
Wallace, W. A.: 1968, ‘The Enigma of Domingo de Soto: Uniformiter difformis and Falling Bodies in Late Medieval Physics’, Isis 59, 384–401.
Wallace, W. A.: 1969, ‘The “Calculatores” in Early Sixteenth-Century Physics’, The British Journal for the History of Science 4, 221–232.
Wallace, W. A.: 1971, ‘Mechanics from Bradwardine to Galileo’, Journal of the History of Ideas 32, 15–28.
Wallace, W. A.: 1972, Causality and Scientific Explanation, Vol. I. Medieval and Early Classical Science, Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Wallace, W. A.: 1974a, Causality and Scientific Explanation, Vol. II. Classical and Contemporary Science, Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Wallace, W. A.: 1974b, ‘Galileo and the Thomists’, St. Thomas Aquinas Commemorative Studies 1274-1974, 2 vols., Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto, 1974, Vol. 2, pp. 293–330.
Wallace, W. A.: 1974c, ‘Theodoric of Freiberg: On the Rainbow’, in A Source Book in Medieval Science, E. Grant (ed.), Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1974, pp. 435–441.
Wallace, W. A.: 1974d, ‘Three Classics of Science: Galileo, Two New Sciences, etc.’, in The Great Ideas Today 1974, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago, pp. 211–272.
Wisan, W. L.: 1974, ‘The New Science of Motion: A Study of Galileo’s De motu locali, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 13, 103–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wallace, W.A. (1976). Galileo and Reasoning ex Suppositione: the Methodology of the two New Sciences . In: Cohen, R.S., Hooker, C.A., Michalos, A.C., Van Evra, J.W. (eds) PSA 1974. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1449-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1449-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0648-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1449-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive