Skip to main content

History, Tradition and Politics: Michael Oakeshott

  • Chapter
Book cover Philosophy, History and Politics

Part of the book series: Melbourne International Philosophy Series ((MIPS,volume 1))

  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous pages the connection between politics and history has been brought into relief from different points of view. The difference corresponds to the difference in focus which characterizes the respective system explored. The very term “history” — as we have seen — is used to denote a variety of meanings. In the course of Collingwood’s development, the term was made to carry several different connotations; in Isaiah Berlin the term denotes the process in time and its rhythm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Experience and its Modes, Cambridge, 1933, p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  4. “The Activity of Being an Historian”, in Rationalism in Politics and other Essays, London, 1962, p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See ibid., p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Experience and its Modes, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. ibid., p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “The Activity of Being an Historian”, ibid., p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Experience and its Modes, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. “The Activity of Being an Historian”, in Rationalism in Politics, pp. 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  15. “The Study of ‘Polities’ in a University”, ibid., p. 327.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Political Education”, ibid., p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  17. “On Being Conservative”, ibid., p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cf. ibid., p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  21. “The Political Economy of Freedom”, ibid., p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  22. “Political Education”, ibid., p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Review of J. D. Mabboth’s “The State and the Citizen”, Mind, Vol. LVIII/231, 1949, P-389.

    Google Scholar 

  24. “Rationalism in Politics”, ibid., p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  25. “Political Education”, ibid., p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  26. “On Being Conservative”, ibid., p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Experience and its Modes, p. 354.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 355. It is not out of place to mention here the characteristic reservation against utopianism present in a previous stage of English philosophy and indeed in a trend different from that represented by M. Oakeshott. We refer here to J. S. Mill — and indeed to Bentham as well. Mill says that he did not think the Utopian doctrines — Owenite, St. Simonian — to be true or desire that they should be acted on. Mill wanted that the higher classes “might be made to see that they had more to fear from the poor when uneducated, than when educated” (J. S. Mill, Autobiography, Oxford, 1935, p. 146). Utopias are to be eye-openers.

    Google Scholar 

  32. “Contemporary British Politics”, The Cambridge Journal, Vol. 1/8,1947–1948, p. 476.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See the “Introduction” to The Social and Political Doctrines of Contemporary Europe, Cambridge and New York, 1942, p. XIII.

    Google Scholar 

  34. “The Universities”, The Cambridge Journal, Vol. II/9, 1948–1949, p. 528.

    Google Scholar 

  35. “The Tower of Babel”, Rationalism in Politics, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  37. “The Universities”, p. 524.

    Google Scholar 

  38. “Introduction” to The Social and Political Doctrines of Contemporary Europe, p. XXIII, note.

    Google Scholar 

  39. “Science and Society”, The Cambridge Journal, Vol. I/II, 1947–1948, p. 691.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cf. p. XII of his edition of Hobbes’ Leviathan, Oxford, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Following Professor Oakeshott’s terminology, A. P. d’Entrèves refers to Hobbes as a ‘rationalist’. See Natural Law: An Introduction to Legal Philosophy, London, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  42. “The Political Economy of Freedom”, Rationalism in Polities, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  43. “Introduction” to The Social and Political Doctrines of Contemporary Europe, p.XXII.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rotenstreich, N. (1976). History, Tradition and Politics: Michael Oakeshott. In: Philosophy, History and Politics. Melbourne International Philosophy Series, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1351-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1351-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1743-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1351-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics